Can Additional Chief Standing Counsel Represent A Private Party? Allahabad High Court Seeks Report From State Law Secretary

The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday sought a report from the Principal Secretary (Law) & Legal Remembrancer about the rights and duties of Additional Chief Standing Counsel regarding his appearance on behalf of a private party as a counsel. A bench of Justice Divesh Chandra Samant sought to know about the permissible scope of duties of State Law Officers, specifically whether an...

CrPC | Magistrate Cannot Discharge Accused At Section 251 Stage In Summons Case After Cognizance: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that a Magistrate does not have the power to discharge an accused at the stage of Section 251 CrPC in a summons case, after cognizance has already been taken and summons issued.Justice Amit Mahajan observed,“A bare reading of the aforesaid provision shows that the provision only contemplates that the particulars of the alleged offence be stated to the accused...

GST | Wrong-State Tax Payment Triggers ₹10.91 Lakh Refund Fight For Vodafone Idea

What began as a wrong-State GST payment has snowballed into a Rs 10.91 lakh refund dispute for Vodafone Idea Ltd. (Vi), after the Delhi GST Department rejected its refund claim. On Wednesday, the Delhi High Court declined to intervene, noting that the dispute turned on how the refund period was selected while filing the application. The case arose after Vi mistakenly paid State GST under...

Income Tax | Tax Commissioner Cannot Revise Assessment On Wrong Assumption Of Amalgamation: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the Income Tax Department cannot invoke its revisionary powers under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act by proceeding on an incorrect assumption about the nature of a transaction. The court ruled that such powers cannot be exercised where a demerger is wrongly treated as an amalgamation. Dismissing the revenue's appeal, a bench of Justices Anita Sumanth...

'Will Consider': Madras High Court On CBFC's Urgent Appeal Motion Against Order To Grant U/A Certificate To Vijay's 'Jana Nayagan' Film

The Central Board of Film Certificate on Friday (January 9) urgently mentioned listing of its appeal before the Madras High Court, against single judge's order directing it to grant U/A certificate for Vijay starrer 'Jana Nayagan' movie forthwith.For context Justice PT Asha pronounced the order today at 10:30 allowing the producers' plea. Minutes thereafter, ASG ARL Sundaresan for CBFC made...

Delhi High Court Upholds Validity Of Election Symbols Order, Rejects Plea By Hind Samrajya Party

The Delhi High Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking striking down of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968. A division bench comprising Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Anish Dayal rejected the petition filed by Hind Samrajya Party, an Uttar Pradesh based political party. The plea sought a declaration that the Election Commission of India has no power...

Husband Maligning Wife At Her Workplace, Questioning Chastity Before Colleagues Amounts To Mental Cruelty: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has held that a husband maligning his wife at her workplace, questioning her chastity and abusing her before colleagues, amounts to mental cruelty warranting dissolution of marriage.A Division Bench of Justices Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Supratim Bhattacharya observed that public humiliation, character assassination, and professional defamation inflicted by a...

BREAKING| Madras High Court Directs CBFC To Forthwith Grant Film Certificate To Vijay Starrer 'Jana Nayagan' Movie

The Madras High Court on Friday (January 9) directed the Central Board of Film Certification to forthwith grant U/A certificate to upcoming Tamil movie "Jana Nayagan" starring Vijay. The film was held up due to a complaint made to the censor board alleging that contents of the movie hurt religious sentiments. Set to hit the theaters today, as per news reports, its release has...

Kerala High Court Annual Digest 2025: Part III [Citations 601 - 858]

Nominal Index: [Citations: 2024 LiveLaw (Ker) 601 - 858]R. Thilakan and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (Ker) 601P.N. Suresh Kumar and Others v State of Kerala and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Ker) 602K.C. Dileep Kumar v Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Ker) 603State of Kerala v. Enforcement Directorate, 2025 LiveLaw (Ker) 604Muhammed Shammas P. v. State...

Calcutta HC: Divorced Daughters Eligible For Family Pension If Proceedings Began Before Parent's Death

A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court comprising Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Partha Sarathi Sen held that a divorced daughter is entitled to family pension if she was dependent on the pensioner and that divorce proceedings were initiated during the pensioner's lifetime. Background Facts The deceased employee retired from South Eastern Railway in 1983. Later...

Madras High Court Dismisses Chennai Firm's Plea To Revoke Food Processor Patent Of Dutch Appliance Company

The Madras High Court has dismissed a patent revocation plea filed by Maya Appliances Private Limited, a Chennai-based company, seeking to revoke a food processor patent held by Versuni Holding B.V., a Netherlands-based home appliances company. In an order passed on December 19, 2025, Justice N. Senthilkumar allowed Versuni's application seeking rejection of the revocation proceedings,...

Transfer Pricing | Delhi High Court Faults DRP For Merely Endorsing TPO's Conclusions Without Independent Findings

While dealing with the Income Tax Department's appeal in a transfer pricing case, the Delhi High Court has flagged that the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) failed to discharge its statutory duty by merely approving the conclusions of the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) without recording independent findings.A Division Bench of Justices V Kameswar Rao and Justice Vinod Kumar made the observation...