Delhi High Court Cancels Trademark Similar To Punjab Football Club Held By Apparel Company

The Delhi High Court has ordered the removal of the “PFC” trademark registered in favor of Posshusa Apparels India Private Limited, holding that the mark was deceptively similar to the trademarks of Punjab Football Club and had remained unused since its registration. By an order dated December 11, 2025, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora allowed a plea filed by Punjab FC, a...

Senior Advocate Yatin Oza Elected As President Of Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association For 18th Time

Senior Advocate Yatin Oza has been elected as the President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association (GHCAA) today. This victory marks his return to the helm of the body for the record 18th time. His 17th election was in 2019 and lasted until 2021.Speaking to LiveLaw, Oza said : "The Bar did its duty; now it is my duty to work for the Bar. I can assure them that I will never let...

Can Accused Directly File Successive Bail Pleas In HC On New Material Without Approaching Sessions Court? Allahabad High Court Answers

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a second bail application, or successive bail applications, may be entertained by the HC on the basis of material collected during trial, even though such material was not available to the Sessions Court or the HC when the earlier bail application was rejected. A bench of Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, however, clarified that in appropriate...

Patna High Court Issues Guidelines For Speedy Trial Pursuant To Supreme Court Directions In CBI V Mir Usman

In a circular dated 12 December 2025, the Patna High Court issued administrative directions to all trial courts aimed at ensuring the expeditious conduct of trials.The circular has been issued in compliance with the Supreme Court's judgment in CBI v Mir Usman. It expressly refers to paragraph 37 of the Supreme Court's order dated 22 September 2025 in SLP (Crl.) No. 969/2025 (Central Bureau...

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court Weekly Roundup December 8 - December 14, 2025

Nominal IndexZahoor Ahmad Rada & Ors. vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 306Arfaz Mehboob Tak Vs Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 307WASEEM AHMAD DAR Vs UT OF J&K & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 308Abdul Khaliq Nengroo vs Collector Land Acquisition Pulwama 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 309M/s Gogi Motor Store Vs Citizen's Co-operative Bank 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 310Dr. Mohammad Himayun through...

Bombay High Court Denies Interim Relief To Chinese Restaurant House of Mandarin In 'HOM' Trademark Dispute

The Bombay High Court has refused interim relief to a Mumbai Chinese cuisine restaurant, House of Mandarin, in a trademark infringement and passing off suit over the use of the mark “HOM.” By an order dated December 19, 2025, Justice Sharmila U Deshmukh held that no prima facie case was made out. The court said House of Mandarin failed to show that the acronym “HOM” had...

Gujarat High Court Directs Release Of Imported Distillate Fuel Seized For Infringement Of Cloud Point, Cites Varied Opinions On Parameters

The Gujarat High Court recently directed release of imported Distillate Fuel Oil which was seized by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence for not meeting the cloud point parameters, observing that respondent authorities had no definite opinions and the opinions vary so far as the parameter of Cloud Point is concerned.Cloud point refers to the temperature at which paraffin wax or other...

[Bihar Excise Act] No Presumption Against Motorcycle Owner If Liquor Found On Person Of Co-Rider: Patna High Court

The Patna High Court recently observed that where illicit liquor is recovered from the person of a co-accused and not from any part of the vehicle, the motorcycle cannot be said to have been used in the commission of an offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Consequently, the statutory presumption under Section 32 of the Act against the owner of the vehicle does not arise unless...

High Court Seeks UT's Response On PIL Challenging Constitutionality Of J&K Tenancy Act 2025

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh on Thursday sought the response of the Union Territory administration to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the constitutional validity of the Jammu and Kashmir Tenancy Act, 2025, which has restructured the adjudicatory framework for landlord-tenant disputes in the Union Territory.A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Palli...

Delhi High Court Flags Customs' Practice Of Mentioning Communicating Officer's Name In Order Instead Of Deciding Officer

The Delhi High Court has disapproved of the Customs Department mentioning the name of such officer in the order who communicated it to the party, instead of the officer who actually passed the order.A division bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Shail Jain observed,“Orders which are passed have to be signed by the Officials who pass the said orders. The communication of the same can be...

New Supreme Court Rules On Communication Of Arrest Grounds Apply Prospectively: HP High Court Dismisses Pleas Challenging Arrest

The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed 29 petitions which challenged the legality of arrests on the ground that the police did not furnish written grounds of arrest.The Court remarked that the Supreme Court's directions mandating written communication of grounds of arrest in the judgement of Mihir Rajesh Shah v/s State of Maharashtra apply prospectively and does not invalidate arrests...

Multiple-Noticee GST Cases Must Be Adjudicated By Single Commissionerate Based On Highest Demand: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has made it clear that in cases involving multiple noticees, adjudication has to be done by a single commissionerate, depending upon the highest monetary demand.A division bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Shail Jain observed,“This Court is of the opinion that in cases involving multiple noticees, the adjudication cannot be done by different commissionerates and...