All High Courts
[MMDR Act] Formation Of District Mineral Foundation Is Beneficial Legislation, Must Be Construed Liberally: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has held that formation of District Mineral Foundations vide Section 9-B of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act) is a beneficial legislation and must be construed liberally for those who are affected negatively by mining operations.The bench of Justice Saral Srivastava and Justice Amitabh Kumar Rai held“The object behind creating...
Matrimonial Remedies Can Overlap, But Cruelty Claims Cannot Emerge Selectively: J&K&L High Court Quashes S.498A IPC FIR
Examining the interface between multiple matrimonial remedies, the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that strict segregation of proceedings under Section 125 CrPC, the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, and criminal prosecution under Section 498-A IPC is not always necessary, particularly because allegations of domestic violence, dowry demand, mental cruelty...
“Very Sorry State Of Affairs”: Allahabad High Court Raises Concern Over State Not Engaging AG In 2016 Case Despite Court Orders
While hearing a 2016 plea challenging vires of a state tax amendment, the Allahabad High Court observed that the State had not request the Advocate General (AG) to appear in the matter for the past several appears and he was requested to appear only in November.Further the court noted that there was no Nodal Officer in the office of Chief Standing Counsel to coordinate with the office of AG,...
IGST Not Leviable On Clinical Observation Studies Provided To Foreign Recipients: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court held that IGST (Integrated Goods and Services Tax) is not leviable on clinic observation studies for foreign recipients, as such services qualify as export of services with the recipient located outside India. Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar stated that having regard to the specific observations made in the 37th GST Council Meeting, whereby it was resolved to...
Second Arbitral Reference Maintainable When Award Is Set Aside Without Adjudication On Merits: J&K&L High Court
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that a second reference to arbitration is maintainable where an arbitral award has been set aside under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act") without any adjudication on merits of the claims, leaving the underlying disputes unresolved. Justice Sanjay Dhar said while allowing the...
Bar U/S 42 Of Arbitration Act Not Attracted Where Seat Is Chosen Before First Application Is Filed: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court has held that where parties have already chosen a seat of arbitration before the first application is filed, the courts exercising jurisdiction over the seat alone will have jurisdiction over all subsequent applications, including those under sections 34 and 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act") notwithstanding that earlier...
Arbitral Tribunal Not Declared As “Court”, False Evidence Before Arbitrator Does Not Attract S.195 CrPC: J&K&L High Court
Clarifying the scope of criminal law in arbitral proceedings, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has held that the bar contained in Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply to allegations of false evidence given before an Arbitral Tribunal, as an arbitrator is not a “court” within the meaning of that provision.“… the term “Court” has been defined...
Escrow Agreement Executed In Furtherance Of Share Transfer Agreement With Arbitration Clause Renders Disputes Arbitrable: Calcutta HC
The Calcutta High Court has held that where an escrow agreement is intrinsically linked to or executed in furtherance of a share transfer agreement containing an arbitration clause, disputes arising out of such escrow arrangement are also arbitrable, even if the escrow agreement does not independently contain any arbitration clause. A Division Bench comprising Justice Debangsu Basak...
U.P. Intermediate Education Act | No Provision To Re-Evaluate Answer Sheets On Presumption Of Students Scoring Higher Marks: Allahabad HC
Recently, the Allahabad High Court has held that there is no provision under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 for re-evaluation of answer sheets based on the students presumption that he/ she would get a higher score if re-evaluation is done.Petitioner appeared in Intermediate examinations. Being unsatisfied with the marks, she applied for scrutiny in Hindi and Biology papers....
“Article 21 Rights Flow From Discharge Of Fundamental Duties”: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail In 2020 Bengaluru Riots Case
The Karnataka High Court, while refusing bail to an accused in the 2020 Bengaluru Riots case, observed that, “The appellant is seeking bail on the ground that his fundamental right to liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution is violated. He gets that right when he adheres to his fundamental duties encapsulated in Article 51A of the Constitution.”A Division Bench comprising Justice...
State's Duty To Inform Farmers Of Right To Seek Enhancement Of Compensation In Lieu Of Land Acquisition: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has held that applications seeking redetermination of compensation under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, cannot be rejected on hyper-technical grounds such as non-filing of a certified copy. The Court observed that Section 28-A is a beneficial provision enacted to remove inequality in compensation among landholders and must be interpreted liberally to...
Forcible Eviction Disputes Not Arbitrable Despite Existence Of Arbitration Clause In Lease Agreement: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that disputes relating to eviction of a tenant are not arbitrable even where the lease agreement contains an arbitration clause and that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court cannot be ousted by such non-arbitrable reliefs. Justice P. Krishna Kumar observed while allowing an Original Petition filed by a retired Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (“BSNL”)...

![[MMDR Act] Formation Of District Mineral Foundation Is Beneficial Legislation, Must Be Construed Liberally: Allahabad High Court [MMDR Act] Formation Of District Mineral Foundation Is Beneficial Legislation, Must Be Construed Liberally: Allahabad High Court](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2025/12/29/500x300_643393-justice-saral-srivastava-and-justice-amitabh-kumar-rai-allahabad-bench.webp)









