LiveLaw High Courts Daily Highlights: September 05, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

6 Sept 2026 11:15 AM IST

  • LiveLaw High Courts Daily Highlights: September 05, 2026
    Listen to this Article
      1. Mere Lodging Of Cruelty FIR Against Husband Doesn't Itself Amount To Cruelty, Not Ground For Divorce: Telangana High Court
      2. Rajasthan High Court Stays CAT Order Holding Advocate's Plea For Interim Relief As Misconduct, Imposing ₹7,000 Cost
      3. MP High Court Questions Judge's Suitability After Finding Serious Errors In Murder Trial, Places Matter Before Acting CJ
      4. Wife Who Left Matrimonial Home During Covid To Care For Parents & Never Came Back Not Entitled To Maintenance: Karnataka High Court
      5. Night-Time NDPS Search Without Warrant Valid Where Urgent Action Justifies Delayed Section 42 Compliance: Rajasthan High Court
      6. Appointments Can't Be Cancelled By Appointing Authority Merely On Direction Of State Govt: Allahabad High Court
      7. Allahabad HC : IO's Oral Apprehension No Ground To Withhold Seized Items In NDPS Case
      8. Delhi High Court Quashes FIR After Friends Settle Assault Dispute, Directs Accused To Do Community Service In Manipur
      9. 'Complete Lack Of Communication': Delhi High Court Flags Two Legal Aid Lawyers Being Assigned To Same Accused
      10. NEET | Debarring Candidate Who Vacates Allotted Medical Seat From Next Session's Admission Process Is Valid: Allahabad High Court
      11. Mere Allegation Of Seeing Spouse In 'Compromising Position' Won't Prove Adultery : Patna High Court
      12. Dependent Mother Cannot Be Denied Family Pension Merely Because She Has Other Surviving Children: Bombay High Court
      13. One-Year Limit Under Section 125(3) CrPC Doesn't Bar Recovery Of DV Act Maintenance Arrears Through Salary Attachment: Telangana High Court
      14. JJ Act | AP High Court Orders Release Of Minor Produced Before Magistrate As Adult, Imposes ₹10,000 Cost On SHO
      15. Karnataka High Court Upholds 3-Month Jail Term Of Newspaper Staff For Violating Order In Defamation Case, Says Tendering Apology Not Enough
    Next Story