Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: April 2023 [Citations 176 - 222]

Nominal Index [Citation 176 - 222]The Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Bhagyashri Ganesh Gaikwad 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 176A v. B 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 177X v. Y 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 178Anil Jaisinghani and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 179Sameer Amrut Kondekar v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 180M/s Omanand Industries & Anr. vs The Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 181PhonePe Private Limited v. Resilient Innovations Private Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 182Gunratan Sadavarte v. Registrar/Secretary Disciplinary Committee & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 183Avijit Michael v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 184 Dr. Shivaraj Pataria v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 185VJ Jindal Cocoa Pvt Lt v. Union of India & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 186Ramnagesh Srinivas Akubathini v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 187Ashok Ratnapal Narwade v. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 188Ashu Dutt v. Aneesha Dutt 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 189Kirti Kumar Jayantilal Patel v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 190Rochem Separation Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Nirtech Private Limited & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 191Shabnamjahan & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 192Mahatarba alias Madhvkar Bhikaji Janrao v. State of Maharashtra & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 193Mansi Bhavin Dharani v. Bhavin Jagdish Dharani 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 194Javed Ahmed Hajam v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 195Nishant s/o Pradeep Aggrawal v. State of Uttar Pradesh 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 196Raju Pednekar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 197Sardar s/o Shahvali Khan v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 198Satish s/o Ramesh Nandre v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 199Sudha wd/o Bhagirath Meshram v. Zilla Parishad and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 200Mukta Dabholkar & Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 201Shobha w/o Sanjay Tidke v. Kishanrao S/o. Ramrao Tidke and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 202R v. S 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 203Assistant Conservator of Forest & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 204Akash Kanwarlal Kamal v. Himani Akash Kamal 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 205Rahul S/o Omprakash Gandhi v. Akola Janta Commercial Co-Operative Bank Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 206S v. H 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 207Sandoz Private Limited v. Bhartiya Kamgar Karmachari 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 208Dharmendra M. Jani v. UOI 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 209Rohan Lobo v. State Of Goa 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 210Sharad S/o. Shankarrao Bonde v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 211Sub-Area Manager, Western Coal Fields Ltd., Padmapur, Chandrapur. v. Anjutai Wd/o Rajkumar Tiple 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 212Chandrabhaga Kolhe v. Suryabhan S/o Champatra Shende 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 213Archana W/o. Ananda Shembalwad v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 214Paromita Puthran v. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom)Vijay Arjun Bhagat v. Kisan Lahanu Bhagat (deceased) and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 216X v. The Dean & Anr 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 217R Mall Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 218Prasanna Laxmikant Joshi and Anr. v. State of Maharastra and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 219Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Manjula Kabiraj Das and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 220Anurag Gupta v. ITO 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 221HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Ltd v. Avitel Post Studioz Ltd and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 222Reports/JudgmentsMotor Accident | Remarriage Not A Taboo Against Compensation To Widow Of Deceased: Bombay High CourtCase Title: The Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Bhagyashri Ganesh GaikwadCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 176The Bombay High Court held that remarriage will not disentitle the widow of a deceased in a motor accident from receiving compensation.Justice SG Dige observed that remarriage cannot be a taboo against motor accident compensationThe court noted that at the time of accident, the wife of the deceased was only 19 years old. She remarried during the pendency of the claim petition.The court said that a widow cannot be expected to remain a widow for life or till getting compensation.Bombay High Court Criticizes Sessions Judge For Giving "Single-Line" Reasoning While Setting Aside Magistrate's Detailed OrderCase Title: A v. BCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 177The Bombay High Court criticized a sessions judge for giving a single line reasoning to set aside a well-reasoned order passed by the judicial magistrate.Justice SG Mehare of the Aurangabad bench said that while writing a judgement in appeal, the court has to appreciate the case as if it is a trial before it.The court set aside the finding of Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad that the petitioner was liable to pay maintenance to his wife under the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court noted that the...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: April 2023 [Citations 176 - 222]

Amisha Shrivastava

Tags