Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: November 2024

CITATIONS: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 568 to 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 616:Nominal Index: Sharad vs. The Chief General Manager, Telecom (R.E.) Project & anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 568M/s. Tata Steel Ltd vs. Maharashtra Shramjivi General Kamgar Union & anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 569Suruchi Rajendra Gurjar vs. Board of Trustees of the Mumbai Port Authority & anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 570Doctor vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 571Vijayamala Tanaji Ghuge & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 572Ashwinkumar Sanap vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 573Puranlal Dhurve vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 574Mayur Ravindra Bhagat vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 575Maharashtra Rajya Bandhkam Kamgar Sanyukt Kriti Samiti vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 576Rakesh Lal Meena and Others v. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 577X v/s State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 578State through Canacona Police Station vs Gulsher Ahmed, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 579Naresh Goyal v. ED, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 580Onkar Kalmankar vs Public Information Officer, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 581Ashish Kishor Gadkari vs Election Commission of India, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 582M/S. Truly Pest Solution Private Limited vs. Principal Chief Mechanical Engineering, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 583Radhabai Shirke vs Keshav Jadhav, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 584Shailesh Ranka and others vs. Windsor Machines Limited and another, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 585Varanium Cloud Limited And Anr. vs. Rolta Private Limited And Anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 586Credit Agricole CIB Services Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 587Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit vs. NIA & ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 588S v. State of Maharashtra, 2024 (LiveLaw) Bom 589State of Maharashtra vs Haribhau, 2024 (LiveLaw) Bom 590Maharashtra State Cooperative Cotton Growers' Marketing Federation Ltd. v. Appellate Tribunal, Employees Provident Fund, 2024 (LiveLaw) Bom 591Satish Kakade vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 592Shri Saibaba Sansthan Shirdi vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 593Anita Agarwal vs. Union of India, 2024 (LiveLaw) Bom 594Ujala Shyambihari Yadav vs. The Election Commission Of India, 2024 (LiveLaw) Bom 595Mahesh Khedkar vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 (LiveLaw) Bom 596Apollo Tyres vs. Union of India, 2024 (LiveLaw) Bom 597B.V. Jewels vs. Union of India, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 598Oberoi Constructions vs. Union of India, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 599Siti Networks Ltd. vs. Rajiv Suri, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 600Kailas Pawar vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 601Ratna Vannam vs. State, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 602Sandeep Pandurang Patil vs. State of Maharashtra & ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 603Delphi World Money vs. Union of India, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 604M/s. Mobile Arts S.A.L. vs. M/s. Mauj Mobile Private Ltd., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 605Mihir Shah vs. State, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 611High Court of Judicature at Bombay on its Own Motion vs. Mayur Gulabrao Patil & anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 612Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs. Union of India & ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 613Neilan International Co Ltd vs Powerica Ltd, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 614SS vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 615Gulshan Townplanners LLP v. Gulshan Co-operative Housing Society Limited & Anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 616Judgments/Final orders: Termination Without Section 25F Notice; Monetary Compensation Adequate When Employee Found In Similar Employment: Bombay HCCase title: Sharad vs. The Chief General Manager, Telecom (R.E.) Project & anr. Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 568A Single Judge Bench of Justice Anil L. Pansare upheld the Labour Court's decision to award monetary compensation instead of reinstatement to a casual laborer whose services were terminated without following due process. The court emphasized that while termination without following Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal, reinstatement is not an automatic remedy, especially when the employee has found similar employment elsewhere.Industrial Court Lacks Jurisdiction In Absence Of Clear Employer-Employee Relationship: Bombay HCCase title: M/s. Tata Steel Ltd vs. Maharashtra Shramjivi General Kamgar Union & anr.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 569A single Judge bench of Justice Sandeep V. Marne allowed Tata Steel's writ petition. It held that the Industrial Court lacked jurisdiction to decide the employment status of canteen workers, as the nature of the employer-employee relationship was itself disputed. The court ruled that under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices (MRTU & PULP) Act, 1971, the Industrial Court can only hear cases where an undisputed employment relationship exists.Indefinite Probation Extension Beyond Regulatory Limits Invalid; Bombay HC Reinforces Procedural SafeguardsCase title: Suruchi Rajendra Gurjar vs. Board of Trustees of the Mumbai Port Authority & anr.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: November 2024

Sanjana Dadmi

Tags