Bombay High Court Weekly Roundup: 05 August – 11 August, 2024

Citations: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 400 To 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 422Nominal IndexIndo Allied Protein Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Food , Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Dept, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 400Hemant Surgical Industries Ltd. Versus Union of India, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 401Naveed Abdul Saeed Mulla vs. State of Maharashtra & ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 402Federal Brands Ltd. vs. Cosmos Premises Pvt. Ltd., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 403Chowgule and Company Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 404Namdeo Chormule vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 405Nitin Upadhyay vs State, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 406Sneha Akshay Garg & Anr. v. Nil, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 407B. G. Exploration and Production Versus The State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 408Sujith Kumar Rangaswami (Criminal Appeal 1268 of 2023),2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 409Shri Madhukar Mahadev Patil vs. Sangli Zilla Madhyawarti Sahakari Bank, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 410Samad Habib Mithani vs State of Maharashtra (Criminal Application 1241 of 2014), 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 411Divvela Ramaiah and Anr. vs. Union of India and Anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 412Prahlad Feku Gupta vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 413Bhavesh Bhinde vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 414Eka Academy Private Limited Versus Union of India, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 415Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd vs. Jindal Drugs Limited And Anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 416Yakub Baig Trust Panvel Erstwhile Mominpada Masjid Yakub Baig Trust vs. Ganu Mahadu Gaikar & ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 417Govind Kondiba Tanpure & ors. vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 418Gandharva Dhaneshwar Patil vs. State of Maharashtra & ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 419Shri. Narayan Damodar Thakur & anr. vs. Shri. Madanlal Mohanlal Malpani, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 420Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Versus SVD Resins & Plastics Pvt. Ltd., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 421 Dattatray Shrikrushna Shejole vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 422Judgments/Final Orders: HC Dismisses Pleas Challenging Maharashtra Govt's Tender For "Anandacha Shidha" Scheme To Distribute Subsidised Food Kits On Ganesh ChaturthiCase Title: Indo Allied Protein Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Food , Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection DeptCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 400In a reprieve for the Maharashtra government, the Bombay High Court on Monday dismissed petitions questioning the tender process initiated by the State to implementing its "Anandacha Shidha" (Kit of Joy) a scheme by which the State would be distributing subsidised food kits to 1.7 crores beneficiaries for the upcoming Ganesh Chaturthi festival.As per this scheme, which was first introduced for last year's Diwali festival, the food kits comprising of 1 Kg each of Suji (Semolina), Sugar, Chana Daal (Chickpea Lentils) and Soyabean Oil, will be made available at Rs 100. The scheme was also extended for Gudi Padwa (Marathi New Year) and now the government has announced that the said food kits will also be distributed for the Ganesh Chaturthi festival.Not Mandatory For Assessment Order To Contain Reference Disclosing Its Satisfaction Of Each And Every Query: Bombay High CourtCase Title: Hemant Surgical Industries Ltd. Versus Union of IndiaCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 401The Bombay High Court has held that it is not mandatory for assessment orders to contain reference and/or discussion to disclose its satisfaction in respect of each and every query raised. The bench of Justice K.R. Shriram and Justice Jitendra Jain has observed that since there is no discussion or finding on the issue of hazardous waste in the order, the respondent department should be taken as having accepted the petitioner's explanation.Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Maharashtra Govt's 'Ladki Bahin' And 'Yuva Karya' SchemesCase Title: Naveed Abdul Saeed Mulla vs. State of Maharashtra & ors.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 402The Bombay High Court has dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Maharashtra Government's 'Ladki Bahin Yojana' and 'Yuva Karya' schemes. A division bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Amit Borkar while dismissing the petition remarked, “We are not moved by what you are saying. This is a speech for roads and not courts.”No Provision Under CPC To Extend Time For Filing Written Statement Due To Pendency Of Miscellaneous Application: Bombay High CourtCase Title: Federal Brands Ltd. vs. Cosmos Premises Pvt. Ltd.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 403The Goa Bench of Bombay High Court observed the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) does not provide for any exclusion or extension of time period during which a miscellaneous application was pending while calculating the condonation of delay in filing a written statement.Cases Filed Before July 1, 2024, Will Be Investigated As Per CrPC And Not BNSS: Bombay High CourtCase Title: Chowgule and Company Pvt. Ltd. vs State of MaharashtraCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom)...

Bombay High Court Weekly Roundup: 05 August – 11 August, 2024

Sanjana Dadmi

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Bombay High Court Weekly Roundup: 05 August – 11 August, 2024

Sanjana Dadmi

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers