Calcutta High Court Monthy Digest: January 2025

NOMINAL INDEXMahabuba Rahaman & Ors. -vs- State of West Bengal & Anr. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 1Milan Mukhopadhyay @ Mukherjee Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 2Jagbir Singh Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 3Association for Protection of Democratic Rights vs State of West Bengal Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 4X v Y Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 5Chaitali Roy (Mandal) v. State of West Bengal & Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 6Smt. Gitarani Maity -vs- 1A. Mrs. Krishna Chakraborty and othersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 7X v Y Case No: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 8Commissioner Of Service Tax Kolkata Vs M/S Electrosteel Castings Limited Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 9Afzal Khan @ Fazo @ Afjal Khan & Anr. Versus Siddhartha Kanjilal, WBCS (Exe), Principal Secretary, Judicial Department, Government of West Bengal. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 10BHARAT KUMAR MISHRA VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 11GOVERNMENT AIDED TEACHERS AND NONTEACHING STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ANR. VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 12Sri Man Mohan Kumar Shahu vs. Union of India & Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 13Bimal Chandra Sarkar & Anr. vs. Smt Dipali Dutta Roy (Paul) Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 14Versatile Construction vs. Tata Motors Finance Ltd. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 15 Haldia Development Authority Vs M/s. Konarak Enterprise Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 16Indian Oil Corporation Vs. Union of India Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 17Zarin Momim Khan @ Zareen Khan Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 18Vishva Hindu Parishad, Dakshinbanga & Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 19Asa International India Microfinance Ltd. v. Northern ARC Capital Ltd. & Anr. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 20ORDERS/JUDGEMENTSPrior Option To Work As Para Teacher Shouldn't Act As Deterrent, Calcutta HC Permits To Work As Samprasarak For Better Service BenefitsCase: Mahabuba Rahaman & Ors. -vs- State of West Bengal & Anr.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 1A single judge bench of the Calcutta High Court comprising of Saugata Bhattacharyya, J. held that prior exercised option to work as a para teacher should not act as a deterrent to the employee to work as Samprasarak/Samprasarika to avail better service tenure and benefits.Employee's Service In NTPC School, Approved By West Bengal Board , Must Be Considered For Pension: Calcutta HCCase: Milan Mukhopadhyay @ Mukherjee Vs. The State of West Bengal & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 2A single judge bench of the Calcutta High Court comprising of Saugata Bhattacharyya, J. held that the employee's service at NTPC High School (7th April 1993 to 4th July 2002), though in a recognized unaided institution, must be considered for pensionary benefits as it was approved by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education, Government of West Bengal.Calcutta High Court Allows Rally Protesting Against Alleged Illegal Commercial Use Of Zoo Land By State GovtCase: Jagbir Singh Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 3The Calcutta High Court has allowed a protest to be conducted against the allegedly illegal use of zoo land by the state government. The petitioner sought to conduct a rally between the National Library and Rabindra Sadan to protest against the same with about 1500 participants. It was submitted that although permission was sought from the police, there was no response to the same.Calcutta High Court Declines APDR's Plea Challenging Denial Of Permission To Put Up Stall At 2025 International Book FairCase: Association for Protection of Democratic Rights vs State of West BengalCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 4The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a plea by the Association for Protection of Democratic Rights (APDR) challenging the decision by the Editors and Publishers Guild, denying them permission to put up a stall at the 2025 Kolkata Book Fair.Justice Amrita Sinha held that a writ challenge would not be maintainable against the Guild, which was a private body.'Wife Is Employed, Already Paid ₹32 Lakhs By Husband': Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Wife's Interim MaintenanceCase: X v YCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 5The Calcutta High Court on Friday set aside an order for payment of interim maintenance amounting to Rs 80,000 per month, granted by the trial court in favour of a wife. Justice Suvra Ghosh noted the wife had already been paid Rs 32 lakhs by the husband, earlier, under a memorandum of understanding and that she was also employed herself.Compassionate Appointment Can't Be Granted To Posts Under Urban Local Bodies In Absence Of Specific Policy: Calcutta HCCase: Chaitali Roy (Mandal) v. State of West Bengal & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Cal) 6A single judge bench of the Calcutta High Court comprising of Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J. held that the compassionate appointments cannot be granted to posts under Urban Local Bodies in ...

Calcutta High Court Monthy Digest: January 2025

Srinjoy Das

Tags