Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: April 27 To May 03, 2026

Citations 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 425 to 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 439NOMINAL INDEXBina Modi v. State & Anr and other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 425Lawrence Bishnoi v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 426Anil Dhupar v. Chintan N Parikh & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 427Const. Satish Kumar v. State Of Delhi 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 428Abdul Rashid Sheikh v. NIA 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 429South Asian Forum For People Against Terror v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 430Rajesh Choudhary v. UoI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 431Sandeep alias Sandy v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 432M/S Utkarsh Enterprises & Ors. v. Union Of India & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 433JSM & Anr v. Union Of India Through Ministry Of Home Affairs & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 434MS. SAMAIRA KAPUR & ANR v. MRS. PRIYA KAPUR & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 435BHUVAN BAM & ANR v. INKWYNK & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 436KAPIL AGARWAL v. CPIO INCOME TAX OFFICER MORADABAD & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 437ANI v. PTI & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 438Vicky @ Gobind v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 439Delhi High Court Quashes Case Against Bina Modi Over Alleged Assault On Samir Modi Following SettlementTitle: Bina Modi v. State & Anr and other connected matterCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 425The Delhi High Court quashed a case registered against industrialist Bina Modi and senior lawyer Lalit Bhasin in connection with an alleged assault of former Godfrey Philips India (GPI) executive director Samir Modi during a board meeting in 2024.Delhi High Court Closes Lawrence Bishnoi's Plea Against Web Series; Allows Him To Intervene In Zee5's Challenge To Centre's AdvisoriesTitle: Lawrence Bishnoi v. Union of India & OrsCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 426The Delhi High Court closed a petition filed against the release of upcoming web series “Lawrence of Punjab” on OTT platform ZEE5, owned by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited.Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav disposed of the plea filed by gangster Lawrence Bishnoi opposing the release, after Zee5 said that it is in the process of challenging the advisories issued by the Union Government asking it not to release the show.Delhi High Court Allows AITA Election Results To Be Declared For Interim Management, Orders Fresh Polls Under New Sports LawCase title: Anil Dhupar v. Chintan N Parikh & OrsCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 427The Delhi High Court has allowed the declaration of the All India Tennis Association (AITA) election results held in September 2024, permitting the newly elected body to function as an interim arrangement to manage the day-to-day affairs of the federation, while directing that fresh elections be conducted in accordance with the National Sports Governance Act, 2025 and the Sports Governance Rules, 2026.Delhi High Court Upholds Police Constable's Conviction For Accepting ₹1,000 Bribe 32 Years AgoCase title: Const. Satish Kumar v. State Of DelhiCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 428The Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction of a police constable under the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding and accepting a bribe of ₹1,000 in 1994, holding that the prosecution had successfully proved both demand and acceptance of illegal gratification.Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha dismissed the appeal preferred by the accused challenging his conviction and sentence under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.Delhi High Court Grants Interim Bail To Jailed MP Engineer Rashid To Visit Ailing FatherTitle: Abdul Rashid Sheikh v. NIACitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 429The Delhi High Court granted one weeks' interim bail to jailed Jammu and Kashmir MP Engineer Rashid to visit his ailing father.A division bench comprising Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Madhu Jain allowed Rashid to either remain in the hospital or residence where his father is located, in presence of atleast two police officials in plain clothes.'Policy Decision': Delhi High Court Declines Plea For Compensation, Public Employment Benefits To Kin Of Those Killed In Terror AttacksTitle: South Asian Forum For People Against Terror v. Union of India & OrsCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 430The Delhi High Court refused to entertain a public interest litigation seeking compensation and public employment benefits to the families and kin of victims killed in terror attacks in the national capital.A division bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia observed that the prayers made fall in the realm of policy decision and cannot be entertained in a writ petition.Unexplained Receipt Of Money By Public Servant Not Bribery Without Link To Official Favour: Delhi High CourtCase title: Rajesh Choudhary v. UoICitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 431The Delhi High Court has held that mere receipt of money by a public servant, even if unexplained, cannot be treated as bribery in the absence of a clear evidentiary link between the payment and any unlawful official favour.Co-Convicts Can Be Granted Parole/Furlough Together In Appropriate Cases, No Absolute Bar: Delhi High CourtCase title:...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: April 27 To May 03, 2026

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags