Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: December 11 To December 17, 2023

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1263 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1299NOMINAL INDEXHavells India Limited v. Polycab India Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1263 DIVYAM AGGARWAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1264 Jan Seva Welfare Society (Reg.) v. Union of India and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1265 PCIT Versus Oxygen Business Park Pvt. Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1266 Subhajit Dutta v. Principal District and Sessions Judge (South Delhi), Saket Courts Complex, and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1267 ATT SYS India Pvt Ltd Estex Tele Private Limited Consortium Versus The Commissioner Goods And Services Tax Delhi 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1268 Santosh Kumar Gupta Prop. Mahan Polymers Versus Commissioner, Delhi Goods And Services Tax Act & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1269 Neeraj Paper Marketing Ltd. Versus Special Commissioner, Department Of Trade And Taxes, Gnctd & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1270 AMAZON WHOLESALE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Versus CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, NEW DELHI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1271 PPK NEWSCLICK STUDIO PVT LTD v. PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL DELHI AND ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1272 ovelesh Singhal Prop Shivani Overseas Versus Commissioner, Delhi Goods And Services Tax & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1273 Dr Suman Gupta v. Ravinder Pratap & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1274 SHANKAR @ GORI SHANKAR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1275 Omar Abdullah v. Payal Abdullah 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1276 Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited Versus Assessment Unit Income Tax Department National Faceless Assessment Centre 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1277 PREMAKUMARI v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1278 IOCL Versus Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1279 BINEET SINGH BISHT v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1280 Bhagat Ram Om Prakash Agro Private Limited Versus The Commissioner Central Tax Gst Delhi- East 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1281 Indusind Bank Limited Versus Department Of Trade & Taxes, Government Of NCT Of Delhi 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1282 VIREN SINGH v. MADHUP VYAS & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1283 TUF Metallurgical Pvt. Ltd. Versus UOI 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1284 ABC v. XYZ 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1285 VISHAL YADAV v. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1286 Court in its own motion v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1287 GOOGLE LLC v. MAKEMYTRIP (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1288 X v. Y 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1289 INSTITUTE OF DIRECTORS v. WORLDDEVCORP TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1290 MS. YOGAMAYA M.G. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1291 Shashvat Nakrani v. Ashneer Grover 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1292 KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL & ANR. v. ARYAN KUMAR THROUGH FATHER RAVINDER KUMAR & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1293 DR BALWINDER KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1294 PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY v. CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1295 HUGO BOSS TRADEMARK MANAGEMENT GMBH AND CO. KG. v. SANDEEP ARORA TRADING AS ARRAS THE BOSS & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1296 U.P. Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd v. C.G. Power & Industrial Solution Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1297 NARENDRA TYAGI v. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (CPIO) 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1298 Usha Bansal v. Genesis Finance Co. Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1299Design Piracy | Overall Impression Of Design Is What Matters, Trade Variants And Miniscule Differences Can Be Ignored: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Havells India Limited v. Polycab India LimitedCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1263In a design infringement suit by Havells, the Delhi High Court has observed that when examining the aspect of design piracy from the point of view of visual appeal, it is the overall impression of the design of the defendant's product, vis-à-vis the suit design, that matters.“…it is the overall shape and configuration which matters. The Court is not supposed to fragment the shape or configuration of the suit design into minor individual elements and start measuring lengths and breadths in order to arrive at a finding regarding imitation/similarity.”Lawyer Tenders Apology For Filing PIL To Ban Anti-Tobacco Imagery In Ads, Delhi High Court Expunges Single Judge's RemarksTitle: DIVYAM AGGARWAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1264The Delhi High Court has expunged the remarks made by a single judge against a lawyer while dismissing his PIL seeking prohibition on the display of anti-tobacco advertisements containing “graphic or gross images” during films in cinemas, TV or OTT platforms.A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Mini Pushkarna last week accepted the unconditional apology tendered by the lawyer who said that his endeavour was never to promote or support consumption of tobacco in any manner and that he is himself against use of tobacco in any form.Ensure Public Toilets Are Clean, Hygienic And In Order: Delhi High Court To AuthoritiesTitle: Jan Seva...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: December 11 To December 17, 2023

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags