Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 17 To February 23, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 190 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 219NOMINAL INDEXDR. B.K. TIWARI ADVISER (NUTRITION) verus UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 190 Gor Sharian v. The Commissioner Of Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 191 Principal Commissioner, Central Tax Commissionerate, Gst Delhi West v. M/S Alkarma 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 192 JAN CHETNA JAGRITI AVOM SHAIKSHANIK VIKAS MANCH & ORS v. SH ANAND RAJ JHAWAR SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S RR AGROTECH 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 193 Dixon Technologies (India) Limited vs. M/s Jaiico & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 194 UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus CHAND SINGH 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 195 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Tax- 1 New Delhi v. M/S Expeditors International Of Washington Inc 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 196 STATE v. HITESH 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 197 SHOBHIN BALI v. REGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 198 Munish Kumar Gaur vs. Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 199 News Laundry Media Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Galaxy Zoom India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 200 SAMMAAN FINSERV LIMITED v. SVAMAAN FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 201 Union of India v. Reliance Industries Limited & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 202 ZAHOOR AHMAD PEER v. NIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 203 DELHI COMMISSION FOR WOMEN v. STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 204 TATA POWER SOLAR SYSTEMS LIMITED & ANR VS. WWW.TATAPOWERSOLARDEALERSHIP.CO.IN & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 205 HOUSE OF MASABA LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED VS. MASABACOUTUREOFFICIAL.CO & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 206 THOKCHOM SHYAMJAI SINGH & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH HOME SECRETARY & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 207 Sonu vs. CBI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 208 RELIANCE RETAIL LTD VS. YOUSTAFRANCHISE.NET & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 209 Pragati Construction Consultants v. Union of India and Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 210 Vivo Mobile India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 211 Renewflex Recycling vs. Facilitation Centre Rohini Courts & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 212 Tilak Raj Singh v. Union Of India And Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 213 MOHD. DANISH v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 214 MR MIRZA AURANGZEB v. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 215 LALIT SHARMA AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 216 SAVE INDIA FOUNDATION v. DEPARTMENT OF FOREST AND WILDLIFE & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 217 CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT OF WEST BENGAL v. VAIBHAV BANGAR & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 218 Unison Hotels Pvt Ltd v. KNM Chemicals Pvt Ltd 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 219'Courts Can't Interfere In Executive Function Of Pay Commission, Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Claiming Pay ParityCase Title: DR. B.K. TIWARI ADVISER (NUTRITION) verus UNION OF INDIA & ANRCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 190A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justices C Hari Shankar and Ajay Digpaul held that the Petitioner who was an Advisor (Nutrition) could not be granted the same salary as that of the Advisor (Ayurveda) and Advisor (Homeopathy). The Bench held that since the posts were different, it could not be expected that the nature of duties performed by the employees could be the same and therefore, granting the petitioner the pay scale which was at par with the other posts would not be possible. The Bench further ruled that matters falling within the province of expert bodies like Pay Commission could not be interfered with by courts.Customs Department Must Intimate Party About Disposal Of Confiscated Property Both Via Email And On Mobile: Delhi High CourtCase title: Gor Sharian v. The Commissioner Of CustomsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 191The Delhi High Court has held that the Customs Department must ensure that the intimation of disposal of detained or confiscated property is given to the concerned party both via email as also the mobile number.Quashing Of Show Cause Notice On One Issue Doesn't Mean Other Demands Are Not Liable To Be Adjudicated: Delhi High CourtCase title: Principal Commissioner, Central Tax Commissionerate, Gst Delhi West v. M/S AlkarmaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 192The Delhi High Court has made it clear that if a show cause notice is quashed by a higher authority on one issue, it doesn't mean that other issues raised in the SCN are not liable to be adjudicated.The observation was made by the bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Dharmesh Sharma in a case where the SCN was quashed by another division bench of the High Court so far as the issue relating to duty on free supply of materials was concerned. However, the CESTAT proceeded to discharge the entire SCN.Educated Litigant Must Keep Track Of Litigation, Duty Doesn't End Merely By Signing Lawyer's Fee Cheque: Delhi High CourtTitle: JAN CHETNA JAGRITI AVOM SHAIKSHANIK VIKAS MANCH & ORS v. SH ANAND RAJ JHAWAR SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S RR AGROTECHCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 193The Delhi High Court has said that an educated litigant must keep track of his litigation and that his duty...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 17 To February 23, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags