Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 06 To January 12, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 8 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 27NOMINAL INDEXBonanza Enterprises v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Customs & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 8 Aditya Kumar Mallick vs Union of India and Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 9 Mr. Pawan Gupta & Anr. vs. Miton Credentia Trusteeship Services Limited & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 10 Akhil Bhartiya Dharma Prasar Samiti v. UOI & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 11 FMI Limited vs. Midas Touch Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 12 Rajeev Shukla vs. Gopal Krishna Shukla 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 13 Rajasthan Equestrian Association vs.Union Of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 14 Anahita Chaudhary Union Of India & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 15 SHWETA CHOWDHERY v. HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 16 MD HEYDAITULLAH v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 17 TEFCIL BREWERIES LIMITED v. ALFA LAVAL (INDIA) LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 18ATS Township Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1(1) Delhi & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 19 Abhishek Bansal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 58(3), Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 21 Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India vs. Akshay Kumar Malhotra 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 22 Late Sh. Lal Chand Verma Through His Legal Heir v. Union Of India & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 23 Novartis Ag & Anr. vs. Natco Pharma Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 24 Amar Singh And Sons Tree Nuts LLP v. The Superintendent Of Customs, Epm, Import & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 25 Gautam Thadani v. Director Income Tax (Investigation) And Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 26 Sonansh Creations Pvt Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 27Customs Dept Should Serve Notices By Email In Addition To Post, Will Prevent Delay And Non-Appearances: Delhi High CourtCase title: Bonanza Enterprises v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Customs & Anr.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 8The Delhi High Court recently called upon the Customs Department to make use of Section 153(c) of the Customs Act, 1962 which empowers it to serve notices through email.A division bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Amit Sharma said such an approach will prevent delay and non-appearances, leading to expeditious disposal of matters.Delhi High Court Rejects Plea Challenging CAT 2024 ResultsTitle: Aditya Kumar Mallick vs Union of India and Anr.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 9The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the results of Common Admission Test (CAT) 2024 for admissions in top management institutes.Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju rejected the plea moved by a candidate, Aditya Kumar Mallick, who was aggrieved with an incorrect answer to Question No. 18 from Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension Portion, thereby affecting the exam results.No Bar To Avail Remedy U/S 9 Of Arbitration Act Even Against Non-Parties To Subject Matter Of Dispute: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Mr. Pawan Gupta & Anr. vs. Miton Credentia Trusteeship Services Limited & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 10The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna has held that the Plaintiffs are not barred from availing the remedy under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 even against individual(s)/entities who are not party to the Family Settlement out of which the dispute arose.The application for ad interim injunction was held to be not maintainable due to pending Arbitration proceedings in regard to the Family Settlement and a pending Application under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act.'Policy Matter': Delhi High Court Refuses To Order 'Rehabilitation Package' For Pakistan Migrants Under CAATitle: Akhil Bhartiya Dharma Prasar Samiti v. UOI & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 11The Delhi High Court has refused to pass directions to the Central Government on a petition seeking “comprehensive rehabilitation package” for Pakistan migrants who have obtained citizenship under the Citizenship (Amendment) Act.A division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela said that rehabilitation package was purely a matter of policy of the Government.Structural, Phonetic Similarity: Delhi High Court Grants Relief To 'INDI' Measuring Tapes Manufacturer Against 'INDEED' MarkCase title: FMI Limited vs. Midas Touch Metalloys Pvt. Ltd.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 12The Delhi High Court has made a temporary injunction absolute in favour of the measuring tapes manufacturer, FMI Limited, against passing off of its 'INDI' tapes by a business dealing in identical goods.The plaintiff FMI Limited, submitted that it is the largest manufacturer of measuring tapes, spirit levels measuring wheels in the Indian sub-continent and also that is well-established in over 60 countries.FMI stated that it adopted the trademark 'INDI' in 2015 and has registered other formative marks. It stated that it advertises its goods in various e-commerce websites such as Amazon and IndiaMart. It stated that its sales figures for FY 2022-23 and 2023-24 was...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 06 To January 12, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags