Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 07 To July 13, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 760 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 783NOMINAL INDEXM/S LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED. Versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 760 CELEBI AIRPORT SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v/s UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 761 Raheja Developers Limited v. Ahluwalia Contractors India Ltd 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 762 STATE v. YOGESH @ GOLU & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 763 RAM KAWAR GARG versus BAJAJ CAPITAL INVESTOR SERVICES LIMITED NOW NEW NAME IS JUST TRADE SECURITIES LIMITED AND ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 764 BIRKENSTOCK IP GMBH v. ASHOK KUMAR(S)/JOHN DOE(S) & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 765 AAKASH DEEP CHOUHAN v. CBI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 766 GNCTD v. Nisha 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 767 Saurav Das & Ors v. CIC 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 768 Rahnuma & Ors. v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 769 UPENDRA NATH DALAI v. UNION OF INDIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 770 Gulshan Babbar Advocate v. GNCTD (and batch) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 771 SURENDRA KUMAR v. CBI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 772 Mubina v. Commissioner of Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 773 Dr Aastha Raj v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 774 SAGIR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 775 MAULANA ARSHAD MADANI v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 776 SHIV SHANKAR v. STATE & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 777 Asociacion De Productores De Pisco A.G v. Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 778 DIVYANSHI KHANNA (MINOR) THROUGH HER LEGAL GUARDIAN & ORS v. HOCKEY INDIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 779 RUSHANT MALHOTRA & ORS v. THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 780 SHANKAR v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 781 AXIS MAX LIFE INSURANCE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 782 RAJAB ALI KHAN v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 783Contract Clause Favouring Employer Over Contractor In Claiming Damages Are Deemed Knowingly Included If Not Challenged Before Tribunal: Delhi HCCase Title: M/S LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED. Versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITEDCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 760The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri has held that clauses of the contract giving an advantage to the employer over the contractor in claiming damages, if not questioned before the Arbitral Tribunal or at the time of formation or execution of the contract, cannot be questioned under section 34 of the Arbitration Act as the parties are deemed to have knowingly incorporated such clauses in the contract.Delhi High Court Dismisses Turkey-Based Celebi's Plea Against Revocation Of Security Clearance On Ground Of 'National Security'Case title: CELEBI AIRPORT SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v/s UNION OF INDIA & ORS.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 761The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea by Turkey based company Celebi Airport Services Private Limited challenging the decision of Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) revoking its security clearance in the "interest of national security".Amendment To Bring Additional Grounds U/S 34 Of A&C Act Is Maintainable If Objections Are Not Beyond Judicial Scrutiny Of Court: Delhi HCCase Name: Raheja Developers Limited v. Ahluwalia Contractors India LtdCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 762The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri while hearing amendment petition filed u/s 34 of the A&C Act observed that the omission to plead a ground of challenge in the original Section 34 petition pertaining to non-adherence to the mandatory procedure of Section 29A would not oust the jurisdiction of the Section 34 Court to scrutinize the same. The Court held that the amendments sought in the present application fall within the exceptions carved out by the Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra v. Hindustan Construction.State's Delay In Filing Appeals In Serious Criminal Offences Prejudices Victim's Right To Fair Adjudication: Delhi High CourtTitle: STATE v. YOGESH @ GOLU & ANRCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 763The Delhi High Court has observed that State's delay in filing appeals in serious criminal offences prejudices the victim's right to fair adjudication of allegations, especially where the victim comes from marginalized or economically weaker sections of society.Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said that Courts must remain sensitive to the said factor while adjudicating applications for condonation of delay in criminal cases involving serious offences.Mandate Of Arbitrator Can Be Terminated For Delay In Passing Award Despite Absence Of Automatic Termination Clause In NSE Bye-Laws: Delhi HCCase Title: RAM KAWAR GARG versus BAJAJ CAPITAL INVESTOR SERVICES LIMITED NOW NEW NAME IS JUST TRADE SECURITIES LIMITED AND ORS.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 764The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh has held that although the National Stock Exchange (NSE) Bye Laws do not provide for the automatic termination of the Arbitrator's mandate after the expiry of the time period stipulated under Bye Law 7(b) of the NSE Bye Laws, the...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 07 To July 13, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags