Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 13 To July 19, 2026

Citations 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 648 to 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 661NOMINAL INDEXZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED v. META PLATFORMS & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 648 Kanhaiya Lal v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 649 ABHISHEK SHARMA v. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 650 ED v. MS VIVO MOBILE COMMUNICATION AND ORS GUANGWEN KUANG @ ANDREW 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 651 Santosh Tiwari v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 652 Ritu Gauba v. Commissioner of Police 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 653 XXX v. YYY 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 654 Savitri Devi v. Bank Of Maharashtra And Anr 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 655 E TRAV TECH LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS and other connected matters 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 656 State v. K 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 657 Rakesh Kumar Saini v. Union of India & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 658 ABID ALI @ AABI v. State & other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 659 GNCTD v. Manu & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 660 GITANJALI J. ANGMO v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 661Delhi High Court Directs Take Down Of Facebook Links Unauthorizedly Hosting Zee ContentTitle: ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED v. META PLATFORMS & ORSCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 648The Delhi High Court on Monday passed a john doe order directing take down and removal of various URLs on Facebook unauthorizedly hosting content of Zee.Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani passed the ex parte ad interim order in a suit filed by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited against various Facebook profiles uploading and hosting its content without any authorisation.Section 354 IPC Not Covered By Section 42 POCSO Act, Trial Court Erred In Not Awarding Separate Sentence: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Kanhaiya Lal v. State (NCT of Delhi)Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 649The Delhi High Court has observed that a trial court erred in not awarding a separate sentence for the offence under Section 354 IPC (assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty) in a case involving sexual assault on a six-year-old girl, clarifying that the provision is not among the IPC offences covered by Section 42 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). Delhi High Court Protects Cricketer Abhishek Sharma's Personality Rights, Orders Takedown Of Deepfakes And Unauthorized MerchandiseTitle: ABHISHEK SHARMA v. ASHOK KUMAR & ORSCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 650The Delhi High Court has protected the personality rights of Indian cricketer Abhishek Sharma restraining several social media accounts, online sellers and e-commerce platforms from using his name, image, voice, likeness and other personality attributes without his consent.No Extradition Treaty With China: Delhi High Court Refuses Vivo Executive's Plea To Visit Ailing Father Amid PMLA ProbeTitle: ED v. MS VIVO MOBILE COMMUNICATION AND ORS GUANGWEN KUANG @ ANDREWCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 651The Delhi High Court has refused permission to Vivo executive Guangwen Kuang alias Andrew, an accused in the Enforcement Directorate's money laundering case against Vivo Mobile Communication, to travel to Guangzhou, China to visit his critically ill father.Justice Madhu Jain observed that humanitarian considerations cannot override the need to secure the presence of an accused facing prosecution in a case involving alleged proceeds of crime exceeding Rs. 2 lakh crores.Delhi High Court Upholds Temple Priest's Conviction For Rape Of Intellectually Disabled Woman, Calls Act 'Satanic And UnholyCase title: Santosh Tiwari v. StateCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 652The Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction of a temple priest for rape of an intellectually disabled woman, describing his conduct as a “satanic and unholy deed” that shattered not only the victim's dignity but also the sanctity of the temple and the trust reposed in the priesthood.Dismissing the convict's appeal, the Court observed that the victim's family had initially attempted to suppress the incident owing to their religious beliefs and the priest's promise to leave the temple, but were eventually “woken up from the spell of the opium of Marxist influence” by his betrayal and the outrage suffered by their daughter.Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking FIR Against Amit Shah, Rahul Gandhi For Not Notifying BNS 'Hit-And-Run' ProvisionTitle: Ritu Gauba v. Commissioner of PoliceCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 653The Delhi High Court on Wednesday dismissed a PIL seeking registration of FIR against all MPs, as well as Union Minister Amit Shah and LoP Rahul Gandhi for failing to notify Section 106(2) of Bharitiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.The provision defines penalty for hit-and-run incidents, where a driver causes death by rash and negligent driving and flees the scene without reporting the incident to the police or a Magistrate.Wife Entitled To Interim Maintenance Under Hindu Marriage Act During Pendency Of Appeal Against Divorce Decree: Delhi High CourtCase title: XXX v. YYYCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 654The Delhi High Court has held that a wife is entitled to...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 13 To July 19, 2026

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 13 To July 19, 2026

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers