Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 02 To June 08, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 650 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 668NOMINAL INDEXMINOR S (THR. MOTHER M) v. STATE & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 650 The Ritz Hotel Limited & Ors. v. MS Hotel Ritz & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 651 Star India Pvt Ltd v. IPTV Smarter Pro & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 652 M/S Ambience Metcorp Private Limited Through Its Director Sh Sandeep Agarwal v. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs Through Its Chairman & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 653 AKSHITA SEHRAWAT (MINOR) REPRESENT BY HER FATHER SH. DEEPAK KUMAR v. DELHI TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY (DTU) & ORS and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 654 U.K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd v. Asstt.Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle.8, & Ors. (and batch) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 655 ANIL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 656 ZIHAD AHMED v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 657 LALIT SHARMA AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 658 X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 659 PRASHANT PAREEK v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 660 INDIAMART INTERMESH LTD v. PUMA SE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 661 MS SADHANA YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 662 Sunaina Rao Kommineni v. Abhiram Balusu 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 663 Karan Kumar v. State & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 664 Delhi Public School Dwarka vs. National Commission For Protection Of Child Rights And Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 665 IMRAN ALI @ SAMIR v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 666 ISHRAT JAHAN v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 667 Anam Khan v. Consortium of National Law Universities and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 668Hospitals Can't Insist On ID Proof For Diagnosis In MTP Cases Involving Minor Rape Victims: Delhi High Court Issues DirectionsTitle: MINOR S (THR. MOTHER M) v. STATE & ANRCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 650The Delhi High Court has ruled that hospitals cannot insist on identification proof of minor rape victims for diagnostic purposes or ultrasound in medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) cases ordered by the Courts.Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said that hospitals and medical institutions must be sensitised that cases involving victims of sexual assault, especially minor girls, require a more responsive and sensitive approach.Delhi High Court Declares 'Ritz Carlton' As Well-Known Trademark In Hotel & Hospitality Industry In IndiaCase title: The Ritz Hotel Limited & Ors. v. MS Hotel Ritz & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 651The Delhi High Court has declared that 'Ritz' and 'Ritz Carlton' run by the Paris based Ritz Hotel Limited are “well-known” trademarks in India.“The long duration for which the RITZ and RITZ-CARLTON marks have been in use by the plaintiffs, wide geographical area of their use, their knowledge among the general public and their goodwill and reputation due to the extensive promotion, publicity and extensive revenue generated by the plaintiffs, in India as well as other countries, the RITZ and RITZ CARLTON marks have achieved the status of well-known trademarks,” Justice Amit Bansal observed.Delhi High Court Grants Superlative Injunction For 'Real-Time Blocking' Of Websites, Apps Unauthorisedly Streaming IPL, Other Cricket MatchesCase title: Star India Pvt Ltd v. IPTV Smarter Pro & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 652In a first-of-its-kind order, the Delhi High Court has granted a limited-duration superlative injunction— an enhanced form of dynamic+ injunction— to tackle the unauthorised streaming of IPL, India's England Tour by rogue apps and websites.Justice Saurabh Banerjee restrained the defendants from infringing Star India's exclusive streaming rights and ordered real-time relief against rogue websites and rogue mobile applications which may be discovered during the course.S.161 CGST Act | Rectification Order Must Be Reasoned, Adverse Order Can Be Passed Only After Hearing Party: Delhi High CourtCase title: M/S Ambience Metcorp Private Limited Through Its Director Sh Sandeep Agarwal v. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs Through Its Chairman & Anr.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 653The Delhi High Court has made it clear that an order in rectification proceedings must be reasoned, passed after affording an opportunity of hearing to the party.A division bench of Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Rajneesh Kumar Gupta made the observation while dealing with a petition against rejection of Petitioner's application seeking rectification of impugned demand order.Delhi High Court Grants Relief To Open School Students Left Out Of JEE Mains CounsellingTitle: AKSHITA SEHRAWAT (MINOR) REPRESENT BY HER FATHER SH. DEEPAK KUMAR v. DELHI TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY (DTU) & ORS and other connected mattersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 654The Delhi High Court has granted relief to various students who got registered with National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS) and were left out of JEE-Mains 2025 counselling process as their result for class XII examination was not declared.Justice...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 02 To June 08, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags