Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 09 To June 15, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 669 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 681NOMINAL INDEXCENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION v. PREMA EVELYN D CRUZ AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 669 Sanjay @ Sanju v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 670 Amanatullah Khan v. DDA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 671 Oswaal Books And Learnings Private Limited v. The Registrar Of Trade Marks 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 672 Vikram Yadav v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 673 Shabir Ahmad Shah v NIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 674 Vikram Yadav v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 675 RSPL Health Pvt. Ltd. v. Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 676 Reliance Eminent Trading And Commercial Private Limited v. DDA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 677 State Of Madhya Pradesh v. KM Shukla & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 678 M/S. Jaiprakash Hyundai Consortium v. M/S. SJVN Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 679 Newgen IT Technologies Limited v. Newgen Software Technologies Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 680 HINDUSTAN HYDRAULICS PVT. LTD versus UNION OF INDIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 681 'CBSE Record Can't Be At Variance With Passport' : Delhi High Court Rejects CBSE Appeal Against Order For Birth Date CorrectionTitle: CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION v. PREMA EVELYN D CRUZ AND ANRCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 669The Delhi High Court has observed that the record of Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) cannot be at variance with the passport as it would create doubt in the mind of anyone regarding an individual's employment or immigration.A division bench comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar said that the citizen of the Country is entitled to a true and correct narration of all necessary and relevant particulars in the public documents that pertain to them.Delhi High Court Upholds 24-Yr-Old Man's Conviction For Rape Of 60-Yr-Old Woman, Says Electropherogram Report Not Must With DNA EvidenceCase title: Sanjay @ Sanju v. StateCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 670The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence imposed upon a 24 years old boy for committing rape upon a 60 years old woman.In doing so, Justice Sanjeev Narula rejected the youth's plea that in the absence of the “Electropherogram” report, the DNA evidence was insufficient to corroborate the Prosecutrix's version.Batla House Demolitions : Delhi High Court Refuses To Entertain AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan's PILTitle: Amanatullah Khan v. DDACitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 671The Delhi High Court refused to entertain Aam Aadmi Party MLA Amanatullah Khan's PIL against DDA's proposed demolition action in the city's Batla House area.A division bench of Justice Girish Kathpalia and Justice Tejas Karia expressed that only individual residents can claim that their property does not fall within specified area of proposed demolition site.It thus permitted Khan to withdraw the plea with liberty to inform the residents of their right to move the appropriate forum, in 3 working days.Can Commonly Used Slogans Like “One For All” Be Trademarked? Delhi High Court AnswersCase title: Oswaal Books And Learnings Private Limited v. The Registrar Of Trade MarksCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 672The Delhi High Court has held that slogans, particularly those which are descriptive or commonly used phrases, face a significantly high threshold for registration of trademark— unless they have acquired a secondary meaning.Justice Mini Pushkarna held thus while denying relief to Oswaal Books, which publishes books for CBSE, ISC, ICSE Karnataka Board, JEE – Mains & Advanced, NEET, CAT and CLAT, in its appeal against rejection of Trade Mark Application for “ONE FOR ALL” mark.Citing Kautilya's Arthshastra, Delhi High Court Directs Govt To Consider Premature Release Of Life Convict Who Violated Parole ConditionsCase title: Vikram Yadav v. State Govt of NCT of DelhiCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 673Citing Kautilya's Arthshastra which makes references to the element of reformatory policy of sentencing, the Delhi High Court directed the government to consider afresh the application for premature release of a life convict who had jumped parole.Justice Girish Kathpali also made reference to the Vth pillar edict of Delhi Topra which refers to a statement of the emperor Asoka that he had let off prisoners 25 times during a span of 26 years.Delhi High Court Rejects Separatist Leader Shabir Ahmed Shah's Bail Plea In Alleged Terror Funding CaseCase Title: Shabir Ahmad Shah v NIACitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 674The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal moved by Kashmiri Separatist Leader Shabir Ahmed Shah challenging an NIA court's order denying bail in an alleged case of terror funding.NIA has alleged that various accused persons conspired for raising and collecting funds for causing disruption in the Kashmir valley and to wage war against the government of India. Shah was arrested in June 2019 and he was arrayed as an accused in the second supplementary chargesheet filed by NIA on October 04, 2019.The allegations against him...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 09 To June 15, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags