Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 10 To June 16, 2024

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 707 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 725NOMINAL INDEXPrincipal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 Versus M/S Care Health Insurance Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 707INDEPENDENT NEWS SERVICE PRIVATE LTD & ANR. v. RAVINDRA KUMAR CHOUDHARY & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 708AMIT KATYAL v. DIRECTORATE OFENFORCEMENT GOVERNMENT OFINDIA 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 709Nirmaan Malhotra vs. Tushita Kaul 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 710Tata Projects Ltd. Vs Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 711Mahesh Gupta vs. Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 712Pitambar Solvex Pvt Ltd And Anr. Vs Manju Sharma And Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 713Indian Spinal Injuries Centre Vs M/S Galaxy India 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 714M/S Talbros Sealing Materials Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Slach Hydratecs Equipments Pvt. Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 715RONAK KHATRI & ORS. v. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 716Continuum Power Trading (Tn) Private Limited Vs Solar Energy Corporation Of India Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 717FAIZYAB MASJID AND MADARSA v. RELIGIOUS COMMITTEE AND ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 718STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. MAGICWIN.GAMES & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 719Vijay Maheshwari Vs Splendor Buildwell Private Limited And Anr 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 720Dinesh Jindal Vs ACIT and Ors 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 721GE Capital Us Holdings Inc Vs DCIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 722PCIT Vs Care Health Insurance Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 723Vaibhav Singh Sunita Kejriwal & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 724Rajat Sharma v. X Corp & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 725Unsettled Claims As Well As IBNR Would Amount To Contingent Liabilities; Section 37 Deduction Allowable: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 Versus M/S Care Health Insurance LimitedCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 707The Delhi High Court has held that the deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act is allowable on unsettled claims as well as Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR), which would amount to contingent liabilities.Delhi High Court Rules In Favour Of Journalist Rajat Sharma, Restrains Use Of 'Baap Ki Adalat'Title: INDEPENDENT NEWS SERVICE PRIVATE LTD & ANR. v. RAVINDRA KUMAR CHOUDHARY & ORS.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 708Ruling in favour of senior journalist Rajat Sharma, the Delhi High Court recently restrained an individual from using India TV logo and “Baap Ki Adalat” trademark in the content posted by him on social media.Justice Anish Dayal also restrained the man, Ravindra Kumar Choudhary, from using the photograph, video and name of Sharma, either as a trademark or logo in the social media posts, audio video content or any services which may result in violation of the journalist's personality rights.Land For Jobs Scam: Delhi High Court Orders Medical Evaluation Of Lalu Yadav's Aide Amit Katyal Hauled Up In PMLA CaseTitle: AMIT KATYAL v. DIRECTORATE OFENFORCEMENT GOVERNMENT OFINDIACitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 709The Delhi High Court has constituted a medical board of AIIMS to evaluate the condition of RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav's close aide Amit Katyal, who is in custody in a money laundering case related to the alleged land-for-jobs scam case.Justice Vikas Mahajan was dealing with Katyal's plea seeking his release on humanitarian and medical grounds.'We Are Living In Era Of Deepfakes': Delhi High Court Says Photos Produced By Husband Alleging Adultery By Wife Must Be Proved In TrialCase Title: Nirmaan Malhotra vs. Tushita KaulCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 710The Delhi High Court has refused to rely on the photographs produced by a man to show that his wife has been living in adultery and to claim that she is not entitled to receive maintenance from him under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.The Division Bench comprising Justice Rajeev Shakdher and Justice Amit Bansal observed that in this era of "deepfakes", it is necessary that the alleged photographs are proved by way of evidence before the family court dealing with the matrimonial dispute.[Arbitration Act] Non-Disclosure Of Section 9 Petition In Another Matter Can't Be Termed As 'Egregious Fraud': Delhi High CourtCase Title: Tata Projects Ltd. Vs Power Grid Corporation Of India LtdCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 711The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju held that non-disclosure of the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in another matter cannot be termed as a case of egregious fraud, which would disentitle a party from pursuing its petition under Section 9.Predictable Application Of Existing Technology To New Context Not "Inventive Step": Delhi HC Rejects Patent To Portable Vehicle TrackerCase Title: Mahesh Gupta vs. Assistant Controller of Patents & DesignsCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 712The Delhi High Court has confirmed an order of the Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs refusing patent registration to "Portable Vehicle Management System" which claimed novel features like Real-time Monitoring of vehicle & Assistance, ...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 10 To June 16, 2024

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags