Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 23 To June 29, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 696 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 717NOMINAL INDEXLATA YADAV versus SHIVAKRITI AGRO PVT. LTD & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 696 Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. A.H. Multisoft Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 697 Jasleeniqbal Sidhu & Ors. v. Union of India& Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 698 HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED v/s RSPL LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 699 SH. RAJPAL NAURANG YADAV & ANR v. M/S. MURLI PROJECTS PVT. LTD & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 700 SHAILENDRA BHATNAGAR v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 701 Dominos IP Holder LLC & Anr. v. M/S. Domnics Pizza & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 702 Sanjay Kaul v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 24 (4), New Delhi & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 703 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. M/S K.R. Pulp And Papers Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 704 T.V. TODAY NETWORK LIMITED v. GOOGLE LLC & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 705 Aktiebolaget Volvo & Ors. v. Shri Ganesh Motor Body Repairs & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 706 Varun Tyagi v. Daffodil Software Private Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 707 Dazn DAZN Limited v. Buffsports. Me & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 708 BHAVREEN KANDHARI v. SHRI C. D. SINGH AND ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 709 Suraj Kanojia v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 710 Sandeep Garg v. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Avato Ward 66 Zone 4 Delhi2025 LiveLaw (Del) 711 Minor Victim Through Neetu Chadha v. Meta Platforms Inc & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 712 SS Enterprises Vs Office of the Commissioner, Central Tax Delhi West & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 713 Kushi v. State NCT of Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 714 DIN DAYAL AGRAWAL HUF versus CAPRISO FINANCE LTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 715 M/s MAHAVIR PRASAD GUPTA AND SONS versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 716 Pret Study by Janak Fashions Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner, CGST 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 717 Jurisdiction Of Arbitral Tribunal Continues Despite Provisional Attachment Of Assets Under PMLA Or Parallel Proceedings: Delhi High CourtCase Title: LATA YADAV versus SHIVAKRITI AGRO PVT. LTD & ORS.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 696The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Amit Mahajan has held that the mere reference to certain assets in a provisional attachment order does not, by itself, oust the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal. Similarly, the pendency of parallel investigations by the CBI or ED into allegations of fraud does not bar the arbitrator from adjudicating the dispute. Arbitration proceedings can continue independently, even when some aspects of the subject matter are under criminal investigation.Valuation Of Company's Unquoted Equity Shares By 'Discounted Cash Flow' Method Permissible Under Income Tax Rules: Delhi High CourtCase title: Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. A.H. Multisoft Pvt. Ltd.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 697The Delhi High Court rejected the appeal preferred by the Income Tax Department against an ITAT order allowing the valuation of a software company's unquoted equity shares by discounted cash flow [DCF] method.In doing so, a division bench of Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Tejas Karia held that DCF method “is one of the methods that can be adopted by the Assessee under Rule 11UA(2)(b) of the [Income Tax] Rules for determining the FMV of unquoted equity shares in a company in which public are not substantially interested.”'NOC For Inter-Country Adoption Held Up For Over 4 Years': Delhi High Court Directs CARA To Take Steps Within 4 WeeksCase title: Jasleeniqbal Sidhu & Ors. v. Union of India& Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 698The Delhi High Court came to the rescue of an Australia-based couple, who were precluded from taking their adopted son back to the country for over 4 years, due to inaction of CARA (Central Adoption Resource Authority).Justice Sachin Datta observed that the Adoption Deed was executed in 2020 and thus directed the Authority to forthwith issue a NOC enabling the Petitioner-couple to take the child with them.Delhi High Court Orders Removal Of Phrases 'Derogatory' To Surf Excel From Ghadi Detergent's AdsCase Title: HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED v/s RSPL LIMITEDCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 699The Delhi High Court in an interim order has ordered removal of phrases which are “derogatory” to Surf Excel detergent from the advertisements issued by Ghadi detergent powder.Vacation judge Justice Prathiba M Singh observed that though comparative advertising by itself could be healthy, remarks that are derogatory and defamatory, would not be permissible.Delhi High Court Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel Abroad For Attending Promotional Events Of Film 'Mera Kale Rang Da Yaar'Title: SH. RAJPAL NAURANG YADAV & ANR v. M/S. MURLI PROJECTS PVT. LTD & ANRCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 700The Delhi High Court alowed Bollywood actor Rajpal Naurang Yadav to travel abroad to Melbourne, Australia between June 27 to July 5 for attending promotional events of the film “Mera Kale Rang Da Yaar”.Vacation judge Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta permitted Yadav...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 23 To June 29, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags