Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 16 To March 22, 2026

Citations 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 259 to 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 291NOMINAL INDEXSHRI BALAJI v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 259 DIMPY CHUGH v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 260 ED v. M/S Mahanivesh Oils & Foods Pvt Ltd 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 261 State v. Shiv Shanker 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 262 HIMAYANI PURI v. KUNAL SHUKLA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 263 Ghunna Ram v. Union of India and Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 264 SSC v. Yashpal Singh 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 265 Padmaja Kumari Parmar v. Lakshyaraj Singh Mewar And Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 266 SP v. LT 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 267 Hindustan Scouts And Guides Association Through Its National Secretary Champat Singh & Anr. v. Union Of India Through Ministry Of Railways 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 268 Bina Modi v. State & Anr and other connected matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 269 SB TRIPATHI v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 270 Veer Pal v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 271 Ajay @ Shantu v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 272 Rajinder Kumar v. CBI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 273 Isha Foundation v. Google LLC & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 274 ASSOCIATION FOR PROTECTION OF CIVIL RIGHTS (APCR) v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 275 KANWARJEET SINGH BATTH v. UNION OF INDIA 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 276 PROF SUJATA ASHWARYA v. JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 277 Newslaundry v. TV Today Network Pvt Ltd & Other Connected Matter 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 278 DR PRANNOY ROY & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 279 HARIS NISAR LANGOO v. NIA and ZAMIN ADIL BHAT v. NIA 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 280 GULAM NABI v. STATE (THROUGH SHO PS KHAJURI KHAS) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 281 WASIM AKHTAR v. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 282 Habibur Molla @ Sonu v. State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 283 Dharamawati v. Union of India 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 284 Manjay Kumar v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 285 Rajnesh Singh v. MCD 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 286 Pankaj Vaid v. ICICI Bank 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 287 Aam Janata Unnayan Party v. ECI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 288 Pawan Kumar Goel v. Jyoti Sikka 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 289 United News of India v. Union Of India Through Land And Development Officer Ministry Of Housing And Urban Affairs & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 290 PJ v. N 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 291Mere Good Conduct After Conviction No Ground To Reduce Electoral Disqualification Period Under RP Act: Delhi High CourtTitle: SHRI BALAJI v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIACitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 259The Delhi High Court has ruled that mere good conduct of an individual after conviction is no ground to reduce the electoral disqualification period prescribed under Section 8 of Representation of the People Act, 1951.Justice Amit Bansal said if such a stand is accepted, it would dilute the mandate of the provision which prescribes for disqualification of a person for certain offences.Subsequent Bail Pleas Arising From Same FIR Should Ordinarily Be Heard By Same Judge Who Rejected Earlier Bail: Delhi High CourtTitle: DIMPY CHUGH v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANRCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 260The Delhi High Court has observed that subsequent bail applications arising from the same FIR should ordinarily be listed before the same judge who had rejected an earlier bail plea, in order to avoid conflicting or inconsistent orders.“…. the Registry of this Court is bound to act in accordance with the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. It is in compliance with the aforesaid position of law that matters arising out of the same FIR, particularly applications seeking bail, whether anticipatory or regular, are ordinarily listed before the same Bench/Judge who had earlier decided the previous bail application of the accused and who continues to hold the criminal roster,” Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said.Property Bought From 'Proceeds Of Crime' Before PMLA Can Still Be Attached By ED If Possession Continues: Delhi High CourtCase title: ED v. M/S Mahanivesh Oils & Foods Pvt LtdCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 261The Delhi High Court has held that property purchased from the proceeds of crime prior to the coming into force of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) can still be attached under the Act if the accused continues to remain in possession of the property after the law came into effect.Delhi High Court Convicts Truck Driver For Running Over 2-Year-Old, Invokes 'Res Ipsa Loquitur' DoctrineCase title: State v. Shiv ShankerCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 262The Delhi High Court has convicted a truck driver for causing the death of a two-year-old child in a road accident, invoking the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and holding that the circumstances of the accident themselves indicated negligence.Delhi High Court Orders Takedown Of Posts Linking Union Minister Hardeep Puri's Daughter To Jeffrey Epstein, But No Global ReliefTitle: HIMAYANI PURI v. KUNAL SHUKLA & ORSCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 263The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to Himayani Puri, Union Minister ...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 16 To March 22, 2026

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags