Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: October 28 To November 03, 2024

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1181 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1195NOMINAL INDEXPANKAJ KUMAR TIWARI v. ED and other connected matter 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1181NARESH KUMAR BAJAJ v. BUNGE INDIA PVT. LTD. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1182Civil And Sessions Court Stenographers Association (Regd) & Anr vs. Shri Vijay Kumar Dev 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1183Ram Niwas versus Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax & Anr 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1184Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran vs. The Union Of India & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1185Shadab Ahmad v State of NCT of Delhi 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1186Union of India vs. OCL Iron and Steel Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1187M/s Jain Cement Udyog (Through Its Proprietor Sh. Sanjay Jain) v. Sales Tax Officer Class-II 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1188SOCIAL JURIST, A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP V/s MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1189Vaibhav Jain vs. Directorate Of Enforcement & Connected Matter 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1190INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION V.SPRING TRAVELS PVT LTD 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1191M/S INNOVATIVE FACILITY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. M/S AFFORDABLE INFRASTRUCTURE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1192HARI OM SHARMA v. SAUMAN KUMAR CHATTERJEE & ANR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1193Jeewraj Singh Shekhawat vs. UOI & Ors 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1194MATTHEW JOHNSON DARA v. HINDUSTAN URVARAK AND RASAYAN LTD 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1195Impermissible To Use Section 45 Of PMLA As Tool For Incarceration When Delay In Trial Not Attributable To Accused: Delhi High CourtTitle: PANKAJ KUMAR TIWARI v. ED and other connected matterCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1181The Delhi High Court has held that keeping an accused in custody by using Section 45 of PMLA as a tool for incarceration is not permissible where the delay in trial is not attributable to the accused.Not Every Legal Mistake Made by Arbitral Tribunal Is Patent Illegality, Scope Limited To Substantive Laws: Delhi High CourtCase Title: NARESH KUMAR BAJAJ v. BUNGE INDIA PVT. LTD.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1182The Delhi High Court Bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna has held that patent illegality applies only to violations of substantive law of India, the Arbitration Act, or the rules applicable to the substance of the dispute. It does not apply to every legal mistake made by the arbitral tribunal.'Dismaying' That Despite Approval From Acting Chief Justice To Upgrade Pay-Scale Of Stenographers, Govt Did Not Release Arrears: Delhi High CourtCase title: Civil And Sessions Court Stenographers Association (Regd) & Anr vs. Shri Vijay Kumar DevCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1183The Delhi High Court recently expressed its dismay against the Delhi government for not upgrading the pay scales of certain stenographers working in the Delhi District Courts, despite the Acting Chief Justice approving an administrative note concerning the revised pay scales.Temporary Suspension Of Business Activity On Account Of Ill Health Does Not Warrant Cancellation Of Taxpayer's GST Registration: Delhi HCCase Title: Ram Niwas versus Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax & AnrCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1184Finding that proper officer passed the order cancelling taxpayer's GST registration with retrospective effect, the Delhi High Court clarified that such order does not indicate any reason for cancelling the GST registration much less from retrospective effect.Delhi High Court Refuses To Let Leader Of Transnational Govt Of Tamil Eelam Intervene In UAPA Proceedings On LTTE BanCase title: Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran vs. The Union Of India & Anr.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1185The Delhi High Court has dismissed the petition of Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, who claimed to be the Prime Minister of the Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE), for impleadment in UAPA Tribunal proceedings concerning the declaration of Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) as unlawful association.Delhi High Court Relaxes 2020 Riots Case Accused's Bail Condition, Permits Him To Travel Outside The City To Attend Sister's WeddingCase title: Shadab Ahmad v State of NCT of DelhiCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1186Relaxing a condition imposed in a 2021 order while granting bail to a man booked in connection with the murder of Head Constable Ratan Lal during the 2020 North-East riots, the Delhi High Court has permitted the man to attend his sister's wedding in Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh. No Surprise Claims Can Be Flung Or Sprung Upon Corporate Debtor Once Resolution Plan Is Approved: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Union of India vs. OCL Iron and Steel LimitedCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1187The Delhi High Court bench comprising Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela has reiterated that once a Resolution Plan is approved by NCLT, all prior claims against the Corporate Debtor are extinguished under the "clean slate" theory. Two Adjudication Orders Against One Show Cause Notice For The Same Period Is Not Permissible: Delhi High CourtCase Title: M/s Jain Cement Udyog (Through Its Proprietor Sh. Sanjay Jain) v. Sales Tax Officer...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: October 28 To November 03, 2024

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags