Gujarat High Court Monthly Digest : September 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 139 to 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 152NOMINAL INDEXX v/s Y 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 139Punambhai Ashabhai Waghela v/s Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 140Yusuf Mehmudkhan Pathan v/s State of Gujarat & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 141Yatin K. Desai (Leuva Patel) v/s Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 142Gujarat Power Corporation Limited v. Tata Power Renewable Energy Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 143Zonal Manager, Bank of India v. Presiding Officer & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 144Narayan Sai v/s State of Gujarat 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 145Chandra Prakash Jain v/s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 146Jaysukhbhai Rambhai Avaidya v/s State of Gujarat & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 147X v/s State of Gujarat and Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 148GPC Infrastructure Ltd. v/s Gandhinagar Municipal Corporation and Batch 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 149X v/s State of Gujarat & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 150Kush Rashmikantibhai Dave & Ors. v/s State of Gujarat & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 151Rajsinhbhai Chhanganbhai Kadchha & Anr. v/s State of Gujarat 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 152Foreign Law Can't Dissolve Hindu Marriage Performed Under HMA Even If Couple Is Domiciled Abroad Or Acquires Foreign Citizenship: Gujarat HCCase title: X v/s YCitation : 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 139The Gujarat High Court has held that a marital dispute between two Hindus whose marriage was conducted in India can be entertained only under the Hindu Marriage Act and foreign family law shall not be applicable even if the couple are domiciled or have citizenship of a foreign country.The court thus underscored that the applicability of a foreign law to dissolve a marriage which has been performed under the provisions of the HMA is "impermissible".Gujarat High Court Upholds Order Denying Reinstatement Of 448 Employees On Ground Of Not Withdrawing Voluntary Retirement In TimeCase title: PUNAMBHAI ASHABHAI WAGHELA v/s INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.R/LPA NO. 84 of 2024 In R/SCA/13803/2021 AND BatchCitation : 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 140The Gujarat High Court dismissed a batch of appeals challenging an order refusing to grant 448 individuals reinstatement with Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. on the ground that they had opted for voluntary retirement and did not withdraw from the concerned scheme within the validity period.The court observed that the employees had admitted that they filed applications for withdrawal from the scheme after the 20.03.2007 the date on which the validity ended. It also rejected the employees contention that that they had a "vested right" to withdraw the application before being relieved from service.Yusuf Pathan Encroached On Govt Land, No Allotment Order Was Issued By Vadodara Municipality: Gujarat High CourtCase title: YUSUF MEHMUDKHAN PATHAN v/s STATE OF GUJARAT & ANRR/SCA NO. 9027 of 2024Citation : 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 141The Gujarat High Court recently upheld an order directing Vadodara Municipal Corporation to take steps to remove encroachment of a plot by former cricketer and TMC MP Yusuf Pathan.In doing so the court held that "long possession" of the plot by Pathan, without paying consideration, would not give him any rights over the land adding that it cannot perpetuate such an illegality. Finding Pathan to be an encroacher the court said that there was no order passed allotting the plot to him.Gujarat High Court Asks Litigant Challenging 'Jolly LLB 3' Movie Teaser To Peruse Allahabad HC Order Dismissing Similar PleaCase title: YATIN K. DESAI (LEUVA PATEL) v/s UNION OF INDIA & ORS.R/SCA/12553/2025Citation : 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 142The Gujarat High Court on Thursday (September 11) asked a litigant challenging the teaser of the upcoming movie 'Jolly LLB 3' to go through the order of the Allahabad High Court–which dismissed a plea for restraining the release of the movie, and thereafter take a call with respect to his plea.During the hearing in the pre-lunch session, the petitioner who appeared in person submitted before Justice Niral R Mehta that he was challenging the certificates issued by CBFC.Update: When the matter was heard on September 16, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition.The plea was thus disposed of.Writ Court Interfering With Every Procedural Order In Arbitral Proceedings Is Contrary To Aim Of A&C Act: Gujarat HCCase Name: Gujarat Power Corporation Limited v. Tata Power Renewable Energy LimitedCase Number: R/Special Civil Application No. 6910 of 2025Citation : 2025 LiveLaw (Guj) 143The Gujarat High Court while dismissing a writ petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution observed that the Writ Court can exercise their power only in cases where the only if the order in questions is “completely perverse”, or the order in questions is crippled with “bad faith” or the order in questions falls in the category of “rarest of rare circumstances”.The bench of Justice Mauna M. Bhatt further held that if the Writ Court exercises its jurisdiction in curing ...

Gujarat High Court Monthly Digest : September 2025

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags