Himachal Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: November 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 212 to 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 245 Nominal Index: Auckland House School & others v/s State of Himachal Pradesh & others., 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 212 Hardeep Singh v/s Manohar Lal and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 213 National Institute of Technology, Delhi v/s Raj Kamal Verma and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 214 Sachin Shridhar & others v/s Himachal Pradesh Housing & Urban Development Authority.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 215 Shri Mansha Ram v/s Shri Amar Nath (since deceased) through Lrs. Sh. Ashok Kumar and others., 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 216 Om Prakash v/s Hon'ble High Court of H.P. and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 217 Sh. Ram Lal Sharma v/s State of H.P. and another.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 218 Union of India & Another v/s Kiran Bala and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 219 Shri Roshan Lal v/s State of H.P. and another.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 220 Case Name: Gargesh Kumar, Sukhwinder Singh v/s Aditya & Anr.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 221 Himachal Pradesh Road and other Infrastructure Development Corp. Ltd. v/s M/s C&C Construction Ltd.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 222 Zydus Wellness Products Ltd. v. Leeford Healthcare Ltd.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 223 M/s Esteem Industries v/s Chhatisgarh Medical Services Corp. Ltd. and another., 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 224 Bhagwan Dutt & others v/s State of H.P. & others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 225 Rakesh Kumar v/s State of H.P.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 226 Secretary (IPH) & ors. v/s Mangak Devi (died and deleted) & ors.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 227 Dilbag Singh v/s State of H.P.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 228 Sajil Kumar v/s State of H.P. and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 229 State of H.P. v/s Gulshan Singh and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 230 Vineet v/s Vishal Sohal, Vineet v/s Dinesh Kapoor., 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 231 Depot Manager of Dehradoon Roadways v/s Suman Devi and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 232 Kashmir Chand Shadyal v/s State of H.P. and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 233 Sunil Kumar and another v/s State of H.P., 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 234 Shiv Singh Sen v/s State of H.P. and others., 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 235 Uved Khan v/s State of H.P. & others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 236 Man Bahadur Singh v/s State of H.P.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 237 Shri Vinod Kalia v/s Bhagwati Public Aushdhalaya through Shri Rattan Chand Kalia.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 238 Smt. Jawala Devi & others v/s Smt. Prabha Bhagra & others., 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 239 Shrinjana Buddha v/s State of Himachal Pradesh.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 240 Lalita Devi v/s State of H.P. & Ors.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 241 UCO Bank and another v/s Smt. Manjana Verma Sahni and another.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 242 Madhu Joshi and another v/s Rajesh Kumar alias Sonu and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 243 Pritam Marshal v/s State of Himachal Pradesh and others.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 244 Rahul Verma v/s State of Himachal Pradesh.,2025 LiveLaw (HP) 245 Industrial Disputes Act | Govt Can't Amend Industrial Dispute Reference Without Fresh Demand: HP High Court Case Name: Auckland House School & others v/s State of Himachal Pradesh & others Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 212 The Himachal Pradesh High Court has held that in the absence of any demand or dispute regarding termination the government does not have any authority to refer the issue to the Labour Court. The Court clarified that such termination could only be taken up through a fresh industrial dispute or a direct application under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel remarked that: “The Appropriate Government in the absence of being seized with the issue of termination… had no authority to make a reference of this issue… The termination… was a fresh cause of action… The appropriate Government suo motu had no authority to amend the Reference earlier made…” Section 10 CPC Deals With Stay Of Subsequent Suits, Not Clubbing Or Consolidation Of Cases: Himachal Pradesh High Court Case Name: Hardeep Singh v/s Manohar Lal and others Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 213 The Himachal Pradesh High Court held that Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code has nothing to do with the connection with consolidation or clubbing of suits. It provides for the stay of subsequent suits filed between the same parties on the same cause of action. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel remarked that: “Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code has got nothing to do with the issue of clubbing or consolidating the cases, because, the same relates to the principle of res-subjudice, wherein, a subsequent suit filed between the same parties on the same cause has to be stayed in the light of the pendency of the earlier suit.” Employer Cannot Cite Delay To Deny Employee's Claim When It Failed To Respond To Representation For Years: HP High Court Case Name: National Institute of Technology, Delhi v/s Raj Kamal Verma and others Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (HP) 214 The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the National Institute of...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: November 2025

Mehak Aggarwal

Tags