Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Monthly Digest: July 2023

Nominal index [Citations 169 - 198]Union Of India Vs Altaf Ahmad Mir 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 169State of J&K Vs Gulji Bhai & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 170State of J&K Vs Rajinder Kumar 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 171M/s Delton Infra Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of J&K and another 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 172Sh. Krishan Singh Jasrotia (deceased) represented through LRs Bimla Devi and others Vs Union of India and others 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 173State of J&K Vs Tariq Hussain 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 174Raman Masih Vs State of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 175Ashfaq Ahmed Vs UT of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 176Chand Devi Vs Sonam Choudhary 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 177United India Insurance Vs Sajjad Hussain 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 178National Insurance Company Ltd. thr. Its Divisional Manager and Anr Vs M/S Rash Builders Civil Contractors and Suppliers thr. its Manager 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 179Bilal Ahmad Ganaie Vs Sweety Rashid & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 180Abid Hussain Ganie Vs UT of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 181Abid Ahmad Ganai Vs UT of J&k & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 182Yatin Yadav Vs UT of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 183Mohd. Abdullah Vs Manager, Trumboo Cement Industry Limited and Another 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 184National Insurance Company Limited Vs Mst. Aisha Bano & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 185Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise Vs Krishi Rasayan Exports Pvt. Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 186Mohammad Yousuf Allie Vs High Court of JK Th. its Registrar General & Anr 2023 LiveLaw(JKL) 187Ishfaq Tantray Vs Khalid Jahangir, Chairman Service Selection Board 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 188Hazik Wangnoo Vs Ut of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 189The Commissioner of Income Tax v/s The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 190Sanjay Sharma Vs UT ofJ&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 191Subash Chander Vs State of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 192Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S The J&K Bank Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 193Khalid Amin Kohli Vs UT of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 194Raj Kumar Gupta Vs Bank of India & Ors 2023 LiveLaw(JKL) 195Mohhamd Rafiq Khan Vs PNB 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 196Abdul Rashid Wani Vs UT of J&K 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 197Raj Ali and Others Vs Union Of India & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 198Judgments/Orders:CCS Rules Cannot Be Applied To CRPF Constables Unless CRPF Rules Are Silent On A Specific Matter: Jammu & Kashmir High CourtCase Title: Union Of India Vs Altaf Ahmad Mir.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 169The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court while reiterating that the service conditions of a CRPF Constable (probationer) are governed by the CRPF Rules 1955 has emphasised that the Central Civil Services (CCS) Rules can only be applied if the CRPF Rules do not explicitly address a specific issue.If a case is already covered by the CRPF Rules, there is no need to refer to the General Rules like the CCS (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, it explained.Jammu & Kashmir High Court Upholds Acquittal Of BSF Personnel In Army Patrol Firing Case That Occurred During Kargil WarCase Title: State of J&K Vs Gulji Bhai & Ors.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 170The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court upheld the acquittal of Border Security Force (BSF) personnel accused in the highly controversial Army patrol firing case that took place on the fateful night of July 16/17, 1999 during the Kargil War."Unfortunately, respondents have been roped in, merely on the basis of suspicion, otherwise, there is absolutely no evidence to establish that respondents had deliberately fired upon the Army patrol party", a bench of Justices Sanjay Dhar and Rajesh Sekhri observed.No Compulsory Retirement Merely On Committee Recommendation, Competent Authority Must Be Satisfied Of 'Bonafide' Public Interest: J&K High CourtCase Title: State of J&K Vs Rajinder KumarCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 171Shedding light on the criteria for compulsory retirement of government employees under the J&K Civil Services Regulations, the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that the decision to retire an employee prematurely cannot be solely based on recommendations from a committee. Instead, the competent authority must independently form a bona fide opinion that the retirement is in the interest of the institution, it ruled.Employer Making EPF Contribution Under Central Act Can't Be Compelled To Contribute For Same Employee Under State Act: Jammu & Kashmir High CourtCase Title: M/s Delton Infra Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of J&K and anotherCitation:2023 LiveLaw (JKL) 172The Jammu & Kashmir High Court ruled that employers cannot be forced to contribute to the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) under both the Central Employees Provident Fund Act and the Jammu and Kashmir EPF Act for the same employee. Making duplicate contributions would amount to doubling the liability on the part of the employer, the court emphasised.25 Yrs On, Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Departmental Promotion Committee To Consider Promotion Of Cop PosthumouslyCase Title: Sh. Krishan Singh Jasrotia (deceased) represented through LRs Bimla Devi and others Vs Union of India and othersCitation: 2023...

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Monthly Digest: July 2023

Basit Amin Makhdoomi

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Monthly Digest: July 2023

Basit Amin Makhdoomi

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers