Karnataka High Court Seeks State's Response On Digital Gold Platform's Plea Against 'Blanket' Account Freeze Affecting Customer Redemptions

The Karnataka High Court on Thursday (July 23) sought the State's response on a plea by digital gold platform Jar Gold Retail Private Limited and its parent company Changejar Technologies Private Limited, challenging the CID's 'blanket' debit-freeze of their bank accounts, contending that it has affected customers seeking redemption of their digital gold holdings.While the single judge bench of Justice Suraj Govindaraj did not grant immediate interim relief, it recorded the petitioners' willingness to furnish customer-wise details and transaction records to facilitate the investigation and directed the State to obtain instructions on the information required from the platform.The petitioners submitted that customers regularly seek redemption of the digital gold purchased through the platform, but the complete freezing of the bank accounts had prevented the company from honouring those redemption requests and processing fresh purchases.“…The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the customers of the petitioner are dealing with gold on the platform of the petitioner. Many of the customers on a regular basis seek redemption; when the petitioner would have to make payments for due amounts, due to bank accounts being frozen, they are unable to pay money to those bona fide persons who have sought redemption. Even as regards the fresh purchases being made, the petitioner is unable to do so since the bank account is frozen....”, the court initially noted in the order.Counsel for the petitioners argued that the impugned notice was "virtually in the nature of attachment" without any quantification. He further submitted that the blanket freeze was a "death knell" to the business, affecting 250 employees and the company's ability to honour customer redemptions for the gold they own.During the hearing, the Court also questioned whether the investigation required freezing the entire bank accounts or whether a lien for the amount under investigation would suffice.“…The learned AGA was called upon to enquire as to whether there are any complaints and the extent of complaints, so that lien could be marked rather than the entire account being debit-frozen. At present, the AGA submits that he is not in a position to make any submission in relation thereto. The petitioner submits that he is ready to furnish any and all information that the respondent requires to be furnished, including the details of the customer, the KYC requirement, extent of transaction, quantum and nature of transaction both for the purchase and sale of gold. The learned AGA is required to secure instructions and make submissions as to what all information is required….”The matter has been posted for further hearing on July 31.The petitions, filed through Adv. Shesha Karthik M Reddy, sought to quash notices dated July 20, 2026 issued by the Deposit Fraud Investigation Department (DFID) of the CID, directing Axis Bank to freeze accounts held at its Silk Board Branch in Bengaluru.The accounts in question, belonging to Changejar Technologies (the parent company of Jar Gold) and Jar Gold Retail, have allegedly been rendered inoperable, preventing the companies from processing customer redemption requests and digital gold purchases.The petitioners informed the Court that this was the second time such notices had been issued, with an earlier round of freezing orders having been stayed by the High Court. The fresh notices on other accounts, however, have once again brought business operations to a standstill, contended the counsel appearing for both companies.The single judge bench questioned the CID on the legal basis for the freezing, noting that the notices did not specify the amount sought to be secured.The petitioner also told the court that the major issue was the lack of power for the police to debit-freeze an entire bank account under Section 106 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which deals with seizure of property for evidentiary purposes, or whether such action could only be taken under Section 107, which requires a Magistrate's order for attachment of proceeds of crime.The Court noted the distinction between two sections: “Attachment of bank account vis-à-vis marking the lien, there is a difference. The attachment of the entire account, they can't do. This is your submission.”The Additional Government Advocate (AGA) appearing for the State submitted that the matter involves aspects of Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors (KPID) Act. He opposed any interim relief, pointing out that the petitioners had already challenged the ambit of Section 106 and 107 BNSS in another matter (before Justice M Naga Prasanna) which was reserved for orders, and likely to be delivered in the coming week.“...Till that is decided, no interim order be granted”, the AGA urged the courtHe further submitted that the investigation was still ongoing with numerous transactions being examined, and that the exact disputed amounts could not...

Karnataka High Court Seeks State's Response On Digital Gold Platform's Plea Against 'Blanket' Account Freeze Affecting Customer Redemptions

Sebin James

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Sebin James

Karnataka High Court Seeks State's Response On Digital Gold Platform's Plea Against 'Blanket' Account Freeze Affecting Customer Redemptions

Sebin James

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Sebin James

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers