Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: August 2025

Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 257 To 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 292Nominal Index: Nayeem Noor Mohamed & Anr. V. Nazim Noor Mohamed. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 257Murali Krishna R AND State of Karnataka. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 258State of Karnataka & ANR AND Mahaboob Patel. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 259Vijayeendra G Muddebihalkar & Others AND Union of India & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 260Vijay Mahantesh Mathapati & Others AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 261Ms. Sumita Abhishek Sundaram v. Sankalpan Infrastructure Private Limited. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 262Sivagami N AND M/s Vinayaka Travels & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 263Santosh Yamanappa Wadakar AND State of Karnataka & Others 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 264Suhas L AND The Chief Registrar Births And Deaths & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 265Spunklane Media Private Limited AND Harshendra Kumar D. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 266ABC AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 267Murali Krishna Brahmandam AND Chief Secretary & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 268Girish Bharadwaj & ANR AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 269Jayalakshmi M AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 270PIO & THE PROJECT DIRECTOR NIRMITI KENDRA AND THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 271Muzammil Kazi & ANR AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 272Assistant Director, ESI Corporation AND M/s. Sansera Engineering P Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 273Ramamurthy C K & Others AND Bosch Limited & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 274Louis Dreyfus Company India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 275Archana Patil AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 276Karnataka State Pollution Control Board AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 277Munisanjeevamma & Others AND State of Karnataka & Others 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 278Mohammed Shoiab AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 279Eshwaramma AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 280Mohammed Shoiab AND State of Karnataka & Others 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 281Lakshmavva Goshellanavar AND State of Karnataka & Others 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 282K M Gangadhar AND State Of Karnataka & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 283Chooti Bee AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 284Shankar AND Secretary & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 285Case Title: Mantavva & ANR AND The Divisional Controller. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 286Malurappa AND Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 287Seetha Nayak & Others AND Laxmi Kom Nagesh Naik. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 288Subhan Khan AND Prabha Mallikarjun. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 289Sanjana V Tumkur AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 290Jagrutka Karnatak Jagrutha Bharata AND The Secretary & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 291S Venkateshappa AND State of Karnataka. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 292Judgments/OrdersReliefs Requiring 'Additional Adjudication' Not Permissible Under Section 33 Of Arbitration Act: Karnataka High CourtCase Title – Nayeem Noor Mohamed & Anr. V. Nazim Noor MohamedCase No: COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.302 OF 2024Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 257The Karnataka High Court Bench of Justices Anu Sivaraman and Justice K Manmadha has observed that an order under Section 33, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“ACA”), even of an interim nature, amounts to an arbitral award and not an interlocutory order.The Court highlighted that the scope of Section 33, ACA was limited to a correction of a clerical or similar mistake or a recomputation or a consideration of a claim presented in the arbitral proceedings but omitted from the arbitral award, but there is no scope for an "additional adjudication" under Section 33, ACA.Karnataka High Court Quashes Corruption Case Against Driver Who Kept Bribe Bag In Car On BESCOM Manager's InstructionsCase Title: Murali Krishna R AND State of KarnatakaCase No: CRIMINAL PETITION No.204 OF 2024Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 258The Karnataka High Court has quashed the corruption case registered against a driver attached to the Chief General Manager of BESCOM, for merely keeping a bag containing bribe in the Manager's car on his instruction.Noting that the demand and acceptance of bribe were made by the Manager who was booked as the first accused, Justice M Nagaprasanna held it is unfair to prosecute the "humble contract employee" who was just 40 days into service and was merely following instructions.Compassionate Appointment Applications Must Be Decided Within 90-Days: Karnataka High Court Issues DirectionsCase Title: State of Karnataka & ANR AND Mahaboob PatelCase No: WRIT PETITION NO.202187 OF 2023.Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 259The Karnataka High Court has directed authorities concerned to decide applications received for Compassionate Appointment within a maximum period of 90 days, from date of receipt of the application.A division bench of Justice Mohammad Nawaz And Justice K S Hemalekha said, “Compassionate appointment matters being a welfare measure designed to provide immediate financial relief to bereaved...

Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: August 2025

Mustafa Plumber

Tags