Karnataka High Court Weekly Roundup: February 24 To March 02, 2025

Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 70 to 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 82Nominal Index: Devanand Patil & ANR AND State of Karnataka. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 70RASHTRIYA SURAKSHA JANANDOLAN SAMITHI MYSORE AND The Commissioner of Police, Mysore. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 71.Kailasam P AND The Karnataka Bank Ltd & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 72Chirag Sen & ANR AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 73Anirudh Suresh AND Honourable High Court of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 74M/s Padma Pharmaceuticals & ANR AND State Through Drug Inspector. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 75Chandrashekhar AND The Divisional Controller. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 76The Branch Manager AND Ramesh Davkatte & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 77Hanumanth N Karkun AND Honourable Minister of Finance & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 78Pavan Kumar M R AND State of Karnataka. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 79THE MANAGEMENT OF MAHINDRA AEROSTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED AND THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY/ DEPUTY SPECIAL OFFICER & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 80Pavankumar AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 81Dinesh Borkar & ANR AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 82Judgments/OrdersRetail Shop Owner Not Vicariously Liable For Substandard Product Of Company: Karnataka High Court Quashes Case Under Insecticides ActCase Title: Devanand Patil & ANR AND State of KarnatakaCase No: CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200937 OF 2024Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 70The Karnataka High Court has quashed proceedings initiated against two retail shop/showroom owners under the Insecticides Act, charged after the jurisdictional Agricultural Officer had seized substandard insecticides manufactured by a Company, from the shops of the two men.Justice S Vishwajith Shetty allowed the petition filed by Devanand Patil and another and said “Petitioners being the owners of the shop/showroom, in which products of the Company was stocked/exhibited for sale, cannot be held vicariously liable and be penalized for misbranding of the product in respect of which they were not involved in the manufacturing process.”Karnataka High Court Permits Protest Rally In Mysore Football Ground, Asks Police To Relax Prohibitory Order In The AreaCase Title: RASHTRIYA SURAKSHA JANANDOLAN SAMITHI MYSORE AND The Commissioner of Police, MysoreCase No: WP 5408/2025Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 71.The Karnataka High Court on Monday (February 24) permitted the Rashtriya Suraksha Janndolan Samithi, Mysore to hold a peaceful march/rally–'Mysore Chalo' inside the football ground in the city, to protest against the recent stone-pelting incident in front of Udayagiri Police Station.In doing so the court asked the Mysore Police Commissioner to pass orders relaxing Section 144 CrPC order in the area so that the protest can be held. The court has clarified that the protest will be held for one or one hand hour around 3 pm today.Courts Have No Power To Extend Prescribed Period Of Limitation On Grounds Of Equity And Justice: Karnataka High CourtCase Title: Kailasam P AND The Karnataka Bank Ltd & Others Case No: WP 11273 OF 2024Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 72The Karnataka High Court has said that Law of Limitation may harshly affect a particular party; but it has to be applied with all its rigour when the statute so prescribes. Courts have no powers to extend prescribed periods of limitation on grounds of equity and justice.A division bench of Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice G Basavaraja observed thus while dismissing a petition filed by one Kailasam P challenging the order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, rejecting his application to condone delay in filing an appeal against the Sale of his property by the bank.Karnataka High Court Declines To Quash Cheating Case Against Shuttler Lakshya Sen, Others Accused Of Fabricating Birth CertificatesCase Title: Chirag Sen & ANR AND State of Karnataka & ANRCase No: WRIT PETITION NO. 26156 OF 2022 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 25699 OF 2022 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 26136 OF 2022Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 73The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash a cheating case registered against Badminton players Lakshya Sen, Chirag Sen, their parents and coach U Vimal Kumar, wherein they are accused of fabricating their birth certificates, to enable them to take part in the badminton tournaments and thereby claim benefits illegally from the Government.Justice M G Uma dismissed the petition saying, “The materials that are placed on record discloses that accused No.1 taking advantage of his position as coach in Badminton Academy colluded with accused No.4, who is also the employee of the Karnataka Badminton Association, accused No.5 being the mother of accused Nos.2 and 3 have fabricated the birth certificates and manipulated the date of birth of accused Nos.2 and 3 to enable them to take part in badminton tournament and claimed the benefit from the Government.”Amended Necessary Rules Allowing Service Of Notices/Summons Through E-mail By All Courts In Karnataka: State Govt Tells High CourtCase Title:...

Karnataka High Court Weekly Roundup: February 24 To March 02, 2025

Mustafa Plumber

Tags