Karnataka High Court Weekly Round-Up: November 6 To 12, 2023

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 420 To 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 429Nominal Index:Dr Uday Mulgund And State of Karnataka & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 420B Narayana & Others AND State Of Karnataka & Others. 2023 (Kar) LiveLaw 421Manjula @ Manju And The Chief Secretary & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 422Ashok M.S & Others And The Anti Corruption Bureau & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 423Prof B Shivaraj And State of Karnataka & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 424Kavitha R & ANR AND The Assistant Commissioner. 2023 (Kar) LiveLaw 425.Dr. Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru And State of Karnataka. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 426Devaraj P R And Karnataka Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Limited. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 427ABC And XYZ. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 428Chandan N V and Others AND Sate of Karnataka & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 429.Judgments/OrdersCan't Compromise On Qualification When Appointing Director Of Medical Institute: Karnataka High Court Case Title: Dr Uday Mulgund And State of Karnataka & OthersCase No. WRIT PETITION NO. 105637 OF 2023Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 420The Karnataka High Court has dismissed a petition filed by Dr Uday Mulgund questioning an order by which he was repatriated to his original Post of Professor of the Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, from the Post of First Director Haveri Institute of Medical Sciences.A single judge bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna said “The qualification cannot be given a gobye on any circumstance whether it is for the appointment of first Dean cum Director or the subsequent Dean cum Director.”Karnataka High Court Refuses To Entertain PIL For Naming Of Roads In Consultation With Villagers Case Title: B Narayana & Others AND State Of Karnataka & OthersCase No: WRIT PETITION NO. 19391 OF 2023Citation: 2023 (Kar) LiveLaw 421The Karnataka High Court has made it clear that which road should be named after whom cannot be a subject matter of adjudication in a Public Interest Litigation.A division bench of Chief Justice Prasanna B Varale and Justice Krishna S Dixit dismissed a petition filed by B Narayan and others. The petitioners had approached the court seeking a direction to the Bettahalasuru Gram Panchayat Grama Soudha to pass appropriate Resolution after taking Representation from the villagers for selecting names to be incorporated on the name plate of each road.Karnataka High Court Ruling: Rectifications In Nomination Form Is Not Permitted Once The Form Is Submitted For Their Candidacy. Case Title: Manjula @ Manju And The Chief Secretary & Others Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 17758 OF 2022Citation No. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 422The Karnataka High Court has held that a candidate contesting elections to a public office is not permitted to rectify defects in the nomination form at the time of scrutiny, which is done post the last date for filing of nomination.A single judge bench of Justice Surag Govindaraj dismissed the petition filed by Manjula @ Manju, wherein her nomination for the post of Member of Tumbala Grama Panchayath from Block-II Constituency reserved for BCM-IIA Women Category, came to rejected by the returning officer.Sting Operations By Media | Karnataka High Court Orders Media Houses To Abide by Cable TV Act Case Title: Ashok M.S & Others And The Anti Corruption Bureau & OthersCase No: WRIT PETITION No.15582 OF 2022 (GM-RES) C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7430 OF 2022 CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7431 OF 2022 CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7473 OF 2022 WRIT PETITION NO.10313 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10335 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10363 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10549 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10585 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10676 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10825 OF 2023 (GM-RES)Citation No. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 423The Karnataka High Court has said that sting operations if conducted henceforth by media houses will have to be in strict consonance with provisions of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995.A single judge bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna upheld the validity of the sting operations carried out by Power TV on 8 Traffic Police Inspectors and 3 Assistant Commissioners of Police, which has recorded them as accepting bribes in return of official favours. It however obliterated the sting carried out where money is thrust upon a public servants of another department.S.17A PC Act | Prior Approval Must When No 'Demand' Made By Accused Public Servant But Money Is Accepted Or Thrust Upon Him: Karnataka High Court Case Title: Ashok M.S & Others And The Anti Corruption Bureau & OthersCase No: WRIT PETITION No.15582 OF 2022 (GM-RES) C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7430 OF 2022 CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7431 OF 2022 CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7473 OF 2022 WRIT PETITION NO.10313 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10335 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10363 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10549 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10585 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10676 OF 2023 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.10825 OF 2023 (GM-RES)Citation No. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 423The...

Karnataka High Court Weekly Round-Up: November 6 To 12, 2023

Mustafa Plumber

Tags