Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: July 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 142 to 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 169Nominal Index:X v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 142M/s Hindustan Equipment Pvt. Ltd. v. State of M.P. 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 143Ayyub Lala v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 144Ashok Airen v Family Welfare and Agriculture Department 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 145Ram Das Sahu v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 146Dileep Mehto v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 147Begum Suraiya Rashid v Begum Mehr Taj Nawab Sajida Sultan 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 148Hemant Malviya v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 149Bhopal Gas Peedith Sangharsh Samiti v High Court 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 150Rajesh Kumar v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 151Yadvendra Pandey v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 152Anupama Alice Minj Vs National Law Institute University 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 153Lal Bahadur Shastri Vyavasayik Adhyayan Mahavidyalaya v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 154Kumar Panchjanya v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 155National Testing Agency v Laxmi Devi 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 156Dhawal v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 157X v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 158Seetu v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 159Sumitabh v Ayukt, Nagar Palika Nigam 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 160Vishal v Central Film Certificate Board 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 161Prosecutrix X v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 162Riya Saraf v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 163Jagat Mohan Chaturvedi v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 164Rajneesh Chaturvedi v High Court of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 165Krishna Kumar Bhargava v State of M.P 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 166Varinder Kumar Naswa v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 167Smt. Mamta Pathak v The State Of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 168Rajesh Raikwar v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 169Final Orders/Judgments:'Had No Intention To Kill': MP High Court Converts Murder Conviction Of Man Who Assaulted Wife With Brick To Culpable HomicideCase Title: X v State of MPCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 142The Madhya Pradesh High Court modified a man's murder conviction–who was accused of assaulting his wife with a brick pursuant to which she died–to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, observing that he did not have the intention to kill the deceased.Taxpayers With Pending Appeals Eligible For 50% Relief Under 2020 Samadhan Scheme: Madhya Pradesh High CourtCase Title: M/s Hindustan Equipment Pvt. Ltd. v. State of M.P.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 143The Madhya Pradesh High Court stated that taxpayers with pending appeals are eligible for 50% relief under the 2020 Samadhan Scheme (The Madhya Pradesh Karadhan Adhiniyamon Ki Puranee Bakaya Rashi Ka Samadhan Adhyadesh, 2020).'Closure Of One Gate Is Not Obstruction': MP High Court Junks PIL For Access To Religious Sites In Khandwa District HospitalCase Title: Ayyub Lala v State of MPCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 144The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Wednesday (July 02) dismissed a public interest litigation seeking directions to the Government District Hospital in Khandwa to allow open access to the general public to visit Hazrat Syed Chand Shah Wali Mazad and a Shiv Temple, which are situated within the hospital premises.Advocate-Client Relationship Is Contractual, Writ Petition For Recovery Of Fees Not Maintainable: Madhya Pradesh High CourtCase Title: Ashok Airen v Family Welfare and Agriculture DepartmentCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 145The Madhya Pradesh High Court, recently, dismissed a writ petition filed by an advocate under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking directions for the clearance of his professional bills pending since 2017.Section 25F, Industrial Disputes Act; Actual Acceptance Of Compensation Not Required For Compliance: MP HCCase Title: Ram Das Sahu v State of Madhya PradeshCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 146A single judge bench of Justice Maninder Bhatti dismissed two writ petitions filed by daily wage workers (gardeners) challenging their termination. The workers argued that their employer had not followed the procedure mentioned under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, before terminating their services. However, the court held that providing retrenchment compensation and the termination order through registered post amounted to valid compliance with Section 25F, and actual acceptance of compensation is not required.MP High Court Refuses To Entertain PIL Claiming No Fire Brigade In Jabalpur Cantonment, Lack Of Amenities For Sanitation StaffCase Title: Dileep Mehto v Union of IndiaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 147The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday (July 01) refused to entertain a PIL which among other issues claimed that Jabalpur Cantonment Board does not have a fire brigade and does not provide basic amenities to contractual sanitation workers which were stated to belong to a particular community.MP High Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Recognising Saif Ali Khan, His Siblings & Mother As Heirs Of Nawab Of Bhopal's PropertiesCase Title: Begum Suraiya Rashid v...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: July 2025

Jayanti Pahwa

Tags