Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: June 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 120 to 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 141Nominal Index:Piyush Patidar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 120Roopansh Khatri And Others Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 121Shankar Singh Dawar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 122The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others Versus Rajendra Kumar Sharma 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 123Parimal Singh Gurjar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 124Dr. Rakesh Kumar Verma Vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 125Smt Anjali Sharma Versus Raman Upadhyay 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 126Dr. Nasheem Bano Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 127Kamlesh Chaturvedi v Saksham Adhikari Dwitiya Vyavhar Nyayadheesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 128M/S Tricon Energy Uk Limited Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Santosh Koli Vs M/S Kriti Industries (India) Limited 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 129Rajaram @ Rajkumar v The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 130Narendra Kumar Sharma v The State Of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 131Nand Kishore Choudhary v High Court of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 132Vishnu Gupta Vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 133Sabla Hasan Vs. The Union Of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 1342025 LiveLaw (MP) 135Arvind Kumar Shukla v Neeraj Nigam 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 136In Reference vs. VA 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 137Shrankhala v Bar Council of India and Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 138Mohit Sadana v Vijay Kumar Goyal 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 139MPMKVV Co. Ltd. & Others Vs. Surendra Kumar Gupta 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 140Laxmi Devi Versus National Testing Agency And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 141Final Orders/Judgements:MP High Court Quashes Condition In Job Advert By Agriculture Dept Mandating Degree From ICAR Accredited InstituteCase Title: Piyush Patidar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And OthersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 120The Madhya Pradesh High Court has quashed a condition in a job advertisement issued by Department of Farmers Welfare and Agricultural Development which mandated Graduation or Post-Graduation from ICAR (Indian Council for Agricultural Research) Accredited Institute.'Gross Misuse Of Powers By Police': MP High Court Quashes FIR In Fake Motor Accident Case, Directs DGP To Conduct Inquiry Against OfficersCase Title: Roopansh Khatri And Others Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And OthersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 121While quashing a FIR in a fake motor accident case, the Madhya Pradesh High Court condemned the act of police officials for misleading the case and fabricating evidences against the litigant to incriminate him in a 'non-existent' case.In doing so, the Court also directed the Director General of Police to inquire whether the activities of various police officials in the matter lead to any criminal offence or misconduct on their part and to proceed accordingly.Sole Official's Absence Can't Hamper Entire Mandi Board's Work: Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds SuspensionCase Title: Shankar Singh Dawar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And OthersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 122The Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld the suspension of an official by the Managing Director of Krishi Mandi Board, who was acting in place of the Additional Director who had been recently transferred, ruling that an officer's absence cannot hamper the working of the entire board.MP High Court Slams State For 'Sleeping Over' Execution Of Revenue Notice After Labour Court Granted Relief To Diploma Holder SupervisorCase Title: The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others Versus Rajendra Kumar SharmaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 123While dismissing State's plea against a 2024 decision rejecting its request for modification of a 2013 Labour Court order, the Madhya Pradesh High Court slammed the authorities for 'sleeping' over execution of the revenue notice passed after the labour court's order and for not acting against erring officers responsible for such inaction.MP High Court Slams Magistrate For Sending Attempt To Murder Case To Sessions Court Without Considering Merits, Says It Acted 'Passively'Case Title: Parimal Singh Gurjar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And OthersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 124The Madhya Pradesh High Court criticised a Magistrate for playing a 'passive role' by not taking cognizance under Section 190 CrPC in a matter where chargesheet was only filed against two out of the four accused for the offence of attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC.The Court opined that the Magistrate failed to apply judicial mind, did not consider the merits of the case and had simply said that Section 307 is to be tried by Sessions court. Clarifying the scope of Section 193 of CrPC (Cognizance of offences by Courts of Session), the high court directed the Sessions Judge to take cognizance in the matter.Order Passed To Save Education Dept's Face: MP High Court Quashes College Principal's Suspension For No Direct Role In Irregular...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: June 2025

Anukriti Mishra

Tags