Erroneous Methodology Used To Prepare State List: Madhya Pradesh HC Directs Issuance Of Fresh List For NEET-PG 2024 In-Service Candidates

Allowing a plea against the normalisation process used in the NEET-PG 2024 exam for preparing state ranking of in-service candidates, the Jabalpur bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday (December 9) quashed the state merit list directing the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) to prepare it afresh by giving incentivised marks to the candidates based on their normalised scores.In doing so the court found that the method used by the body did not show the substantive merit of the candidate but their comparative merit, and questioned how a candidate who was higher in the All India Rank scored lower in the State list which it said defied logic. A division bench of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Vinay Saraf in its order said: "Since, as per the reply filed by NBEMS, rankings are based on relative performance. It is not discernible as to how and why relative performance can change between two candidates by merely placing them in different lists.The methodology of percentile as contended by the NBEMS does not reflect the substantive merit of a candidate but a comparative merit of the candidate. In this view, it completely defies logic as to how a candidate who has scored higher in comparison to another candidate in the All India rank list has scored lower in the State List in comparison to the same candidate. The comparison of scores has to be in relation to the examination and not a list. It is unfathomable that a candidate in the same examination is higher in one list and lower in another list vis a vis the same candidate.If the ranking in the All India List merit list is based on relative performance, then the relative performance of two candidates cannot change when they are separated and placed in the State List"The Petitioners in this case were all in-service candidates and had appeared in NEET-PG 2024 examination, sought a direction against the Respondents to redraw the State Merit list for the in-service candidates. Advocate Aditya Sanghi represented the petitioners and their primary contention was that their merit in the All India List was higher than some of the other in-service candidates but in the State List they were lower in the Merit.NEET-PG examination was initially scheduled to be held on June 23 in a single shift, however the same was postponed to be held on August 11 in two shifts. NBEMS conducted the exam and notified on August 9 that the "percentile based normalisation process which was used by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi" for its various examinations conducted in more than one shift, would be adopted.As per the NBEMS, to eliminate bias in distribution of candidates, equal numbers of candidates were randomly allotted different groups (shifts). Further, with a large population of examinees spread over the entire country, possibility of bias becomes remote. The overall ranking has been based on the percentile score of the 'Raw score' of the candidates in their respective shift and tie-breaking. Percentiles up to 7 decimal places for the raw score were calculated and the percentile score for the raw scores for both the shifts were merged and to derive the ranking. The concept of percentile score is of relative performance to all those who have appeared. NBEMS said that the NEET – PG 2024 rank was based on percentile obtained as per the notified normalisation process. It contended that in India many states have a provision to award additional incentivised marks in NEET – PG to their in-service candidates who have served in rural/hard posting. The order notes that in Madhya Pradesh, in-service candidates who have served in rural/hard posting are entitled to 10%, 20% and 30% incentivised marks in percentage of their raw scores based on the period of completed service in rural/hard area. Candidates who have completed one year are entitled to 10%, and those who have completed two years, 20% and those more than three years, 30% incentivised marks of their raw scores.It was submitted that as the examination was held in two different shifts, the standard practise is to adopt a normalisation process so as to equalise the scores of the two shifts. They stated that the overall merit/ranking is based on percentile of raw score obtained by the candidates in their respective shifts and 'tie breaking' criteria as mentioned in the information bulletin for NEET-PG 2024. Percentile (up to 7 decimal places) for the raw score is to be calculated. The percentile (not percentage) for the raw score for both the shifts is merged and arranged so as to derive an overall Merit/Ranking. The percentile ranges from 100 to 0. The percentile indicates the percentage of candidates that have scored equal to or below (same or lower raw scores) that particular percentile in a shift of that examination. The topper (highest scorer) of each group gets the same percentile of 100. The marks scored between the highest and lowest scores are converted to appropriate ...

Erroneous Methodology Used To Prepare State List: Madhya Pradesh HC Directs Issuance Of Fresh List For NEET-PG 2024 In-Service Candidates

Siddhi Nigam

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Erroneous Methodology Used To Prepare State List: Madhya Pradesh HC Directs Issuance Of Fresh List For NEET-PG 2024 In-Service Candidates

Siddhi Nigam

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers