LiveLaw Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: July 13 to July 19, 2026

Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 264 to 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 283Nominal IndexDharmendra Lodhi v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 264Amit Kumar Singh Raghuvanshi v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 265S v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 266UJ v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 267Priyanka Goswami v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 268Abhishek Yadav v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 269Ganga Singh v Devi Singh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 270Municipal Corporation Gwalior v Smt Padma Bansal 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 271Bablu Sen v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 272Virendra Kumar v Anurag Mishra 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 273B v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 274DK Kamthan v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 275LY v RY 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 276Chandrapal Singh Parihar v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 277PS Mandeliya v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 278P Dakshinamurthy v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 279Ram Kailash Gupta v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 280Santosh Solanki v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 281Khizar Khan v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 282Kalyan Singh Pawar v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 283'Alarming': MP High Court Says Police May Be Deliberately Ignoring Arrest Procedure To Help Accused Secure ReleaseThe Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed the Director General of Police to issue a circular warning all investigating officers over strict compliance with Section 47 BNSS requirement and Supreme Court guidelines in the Pankaj Bansal case, which mandates that grounds of arrest must be communicated in writing. [2026 LiveLaw (MP) 264]Case Title: Dharmendra Lodhi v State of Madhya Pradesh, WP-25312-2026Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 264One Time Adverse Remarks Cannot Permanently Debar Lawyer From Future Appointment: MP High Court Upholds Law Officer's SelectionThe Madhya Pradesh High Court has upheld the appointment of a government law officer, observing that a single instance of adverse remarks in the past cannot permanently disqualify the advocate from future appointments. [2026 LiveLaw (MP) 265]Case Title: Amit Kumar Singh Raghuvanshi v State of Madhya PradeshCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 265MP High Court Allows Minor Girl To Live With Father Facing POCSO Charges After She Claims He Was Falsely ImplicatedThe Madhya Pradesh High Court permitted a minor girl to live with her father and elder sister, after noting that the daughter in her statement had said that he was falsely accused of sexually harassing her at the instance of her mother. [2026 LiveLaw (MP) 266]Case Title: S v State of Madhya Pradesh, WP-20029-2026Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 266Major Woman Free To Live Wherever She Wishes; Courts Can't Issue Directions Contrary To Her Free Will: Madhya Pradesh High CourtThe Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed a mother's habeas corpus plea seeking that her daughter be traced, observing that the daughter is an adult woman who cannot be forced to reside at home with her parents merely because they disagree with her choice of partner. [2026 LiveLaw (MP) 267]Case Title: UJ v State of Madhya Pradesh, WP-25504-2026Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 267Newly-Recruited Bank Employee May Have Deviated From Procedure Under Superiors' Influence: MP High Court Grants Bail In Embezzlement FIRThe Madhya Pradesh High Court has granted anticipatory bail to the Teller of ESAF Small Finance Bank in an embezzlement FIR, observing that she was newly appointed and was susceptible to the influence or commands of superior officers, especially when she did not receive any financial benefit from embezzling. [2026 LiveLaw (MP) 268]Case Title: Priyanka Goswami v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-27687-2026Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 268'Genesis Of Relationship Doubtful': After Woman Admits She's Not Practising Advocate, MP High Court Quashes Her Rape FIR Against 'Client'The Madhya Pradesh High Court has quashed a rape FIR lodged by a woman against her alleged client after she admitted before the Court that she was not, in fact, a practising advocate. [2026 LiveLaw (MP) 269]Holding that the complainant-respondent's earlier claim that she had met the accused while professionally assisting him in a child custody dispute constituted the foundation of the prosecution case, the Court observed that the very genesis of the relationship between the parties had become doubtful.Case Title: Abhishek Yadav v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-7186-2025Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 269HAMA | Major Unmarried Daughter Need Not Show Disability To Claim Maintenance If Unable To Maintain Herself From Own Earnings: MP High CourtUpholding a family court order granting maintenance pendente lite of ₹2,000 to an unmarried adult daughter, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed that Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAM Act) clearly states that the daughter needs to show that she is unable to maintain herself with her...

LiveLaw Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: July 13 to July 19, 2026

Jayanti Pahwa

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Jayanti Pahwa

LiveLaw Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: July 13 to July 19, 2026

Jayanti Pahwa

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Jayanti Pahwa

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers