AILAJ Denies Writing Letter Alleging Senior Advocate Took Money On Pretext To Bribe Madras High Court Judge

The All India Lawyers Association for Justice (AILAJ) has written to the Madras High Court registry stating that an earlier letter claiming that a senior advocate had taken Rs 50 Lakh from a client to allegedly bribe a judge was fake. The letter, signed by the State Co-ordinator for AILAJ, U Adhiyaman, states that the association was shocked to know that it's name was being misused in...

Hardship In Raising Mentally Disabled Child No Ground To Kill Her: Madras High Court Upholds Parents' Conviction For Poisoning Daughter

The Madras High Court recently upheld the conviction and sentence of a couple for administering poison and killing their child with mental disorder. While the bench of Justice G Jayachandran and Justice R Poornima sympathised with the parents and the difficulties that they may have faced to bring up the child, the court noted that the parents had a bounden duty to take care of their...

TN Service Rules Prohibit Bigamy, Can't Include Second Wife's Name In Pension Order Even After Death Of First Wife: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court recently held that the Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules prohibit contracting of a second marriage during the lifetime of the first wife. The bench of Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice C Kumarappan noted that bigamous marriage was a grave misconduct under the service rules, warranting departmental action. Thus, the court ruled that the second wife's...

PIL In Madras High Court Challenges Centre's New Law Replacing MGNREGA, Says It Makes Centre Incharge Of State Subjects

A plea has been filed in the Madras High Court challenging eight provisions of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act [VB-G-RAM G]. The plea, filed by Advocate T Sivagnanasambandan alleges that the provisions of the new Act, which is replacing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), are anti-federal and ultra vires...

Madras High Court Weekly Round-Up: February 09 - February 15, 2026

Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 57 To 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 68 NOMINAL INDEX Pradeep Rajan v. State of Tamil Nadu and Another, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 57 M/s KVN Productions v. Central Board of Film Certification and another, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 58 M/s. Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. v M/s. Ad Bureau Advertising Pvt Ltd, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 59 Jawahar Rajan v The Regional...

Previous Service As Village Assistant Can't be Excluded For Pension : Madras HC

A Division Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Justice G. Jayachandran and Justice K. K. Ramakrishnan held that the service rendered as a full-time Village Assistant after 01.06.1995 cannot be treated as non-provincialised service. It must be fully counted along with Village Administrative Officer service for pensionary benefits. Background Facts The respondents worked...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest: January 2026 [Citation 1 to 51]

Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 1 To 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 51 NOMINAL INDEX Neelima v. The Additional Chief Secretary and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 1 C. Aryama Sundaram v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chennai, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 2 Siva.Kalaimani Ambalam v. The District Collector and Others, 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 3 M. Manickamoorthy v. The District Collector and...

Madras High Court Calls For Inquiry On Claim That Senior Advocate Took Rs 50 Lakh From Client On Pretext Of Bribing Judge

A Madras High Court judge recently recused from hearing a case after All India Lawyers Association for Justice (AILAJ) alleged that a senior advocate had taken a sum of Rs 50 Lakh from the client in the name of bribing the judge for passing suitable orders. Justice Nirmal Kumar recused from hearing the case and directed that the matter be placed before the Chief Justice for posting...

Madras High Court Upholds Conviction Of Pastor For Sexually Assaulting Disabled Minor

The Madras High Court recently upheld the conviction of a pastor for sexually assaulting a minor who had physical and intellectual disability. The bench of Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan and Justice R Poornima held that the circumstances, the testimony of victim, and failure of the accused to rebut the statutory presumption established his guilt. The court was hearing an appeal filed by a...

Places Of Worship Act Does Not Protect Encroachment By Temple On Government Land: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court recently dismissed a plea by the Managing Trustee of Sri Arulmighu Raajakaliamman Temple in Ramanathapuram District of Tamil Nadu, claiming protection for the temple which was allegedly built on an encroached land. Rejecting the claim that the ancient temple was protected under the Places of Worship Act, the bench of Justice G Jayachandran and Justice KK Ramakrishnan...

Interest Of Child Paramount, Not Of Perpetrator: Madras High Court Affirms Joint Trial In POCSO Case

The Madras High Court recently dismissed an appeal filed by an accused under the Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act noting that there was no failure of justice merely because there was a joint trial. The bench of Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan and Justice R Poornima observed that when courts were dealing with matters of child abuse, they must apply the laws in the...

'Protecting Women Employees From Sexual Harassment At Workplace Is Public Duty': Madras High Court Tells Railway Employees Co-op Society

The Madras High Court has criticised the Railway Employees Cooperative Credit Society for not taking appropriate action on a sexual harassment complaint made by one of its woman employees. Rejecting the society's argument that a writ petition would not be maintainable against the credit society, Justice Bharatha Chakravarthy ruled that protecting women employees from sexual harassment...