Madras High Court Monthly Digest - April 2024 [Citations 143 - 180]

Citations: 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 143 To 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 180 NOMINAL INDEX Sri K.Venkatesh v. The Principal Secretary to Government and Ors, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 143 M/s Bagalkot Cement & Industries Ltd vs The Chairperson, Micro Small and Medium Enterprises and Anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 144 S.Sujatha vs The Director Of Collegiate Education, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 145 V Syril Sundaraj v The Presiding Officer and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 146 M. Anantha Babu vs. The District Collector & Ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 147 Pandiammal vs Commissioner, Social Welfare and Women Empowerment Department & Ors, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 148 S. Keerthana v. The Commissioner of Milk Production and Dairy Development Department & Ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 149 Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (MMBA) v A Radhakrishnan and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 150 S Mariaselvi v AS Mani and Ors, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 151 Sivakumar TD v State of Tamil Nadu, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 152 S.ShreDharmaaraghavan v Inspector of Police and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 153 Nippon Paint Holdings Co. Ltd and Another v Suraj Sharma and Another, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 154 Karti P Chidambaram v The Regional Passport Officer Chennai, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 155 Sri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust versus Central Board of Direct Taxes, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 156 M Chellammal v Office of the Insurance Ombudsman, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 157 Rajasekaran v The Assistant Election Officer, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 158 M/s.Eicher Motors Limited Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax and Central Excise, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 159 Dr A Seshadri and Others v Church of South India and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 160 V Maharajan v. The Election Commission, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 161 M/s.Bay-Forge Private Limited Versus Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/ Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 162 S Dhinakaran v The Commissioner of HR and CE and Ors, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 163 Ramesh v Selvakumar and Another, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 164 M/s.Bajrang & Bajrang Versus The State Tax Officer (FAC), 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 165 Sahayaraj V. M/s Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd, CRP(MD) No. 576 of 2024, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 166 Rajesh Das v State, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 167 CM Raghavan v The Joint Director and others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 168 M/s Colorhome Developers Pvt Ltd v. M/s Color Castle Owners Society, OSA(CAD) No. 113 of 2022, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 169 M/s Geojit Financial Services Ltd v. Mrs. Nalani Rajkumar, Original Side Appeal (CAD) No.51 of 2021, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 170 Mohmood Hussain v State, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 171 Kamatchi Shanker Arumugam v Tamil Nadu School Education Department and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 172 S Sahana Priyanka and Others v State of Tamil Nadu, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 173 AP Studio Enterprises Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC), 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 174 R Rajamani v The State of Tamil Nadu, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 175 Sasikumar v Union Government of India and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 176 Arumugapandian @ Bala Vivekanandan @ Rocket Raja v State, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 177 Suthanthira Kannan v Election Commission of India and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 178 K Selvakumar v The State and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 179 A Sathiya Prakash v The Board of Control for Cricket in India and Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 180 REPORTS Giving Police Protection To People With Criminal Background Will Send Wrong Signal, Make Public Lose Faith In System: Madras High Court Case Title: Sri K.Venkatesh v. The Principal Secretary to Government and Ors Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 143 The Madras High Court recently opined against giving police protection to persons with criminal backgrounds as it would send a wrong signal to society and would make people lose their faith in the existing system. Justice Anand Venkatesh added that courts must be very circumspect to grant police protection to any person with a criminal background. The court added that even if some persons with criminal backgrounds are given police protection, the same could not be taken as a precedent by the courts. MSMED Act | Imposition Of Three Times Bank Interest By MSME Facilitation Council Is Violation Of Principles Of Reasonableness And Fairness: Madras High Court Case Title: M/s Bagalkot Cement & Industries Ltd vs The Chairperson, Micro Small and Medium Enterprises and Anr. Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 144 The Madras High Court single bench of Justice R. N. Manjula held that the imposition of three times of the bank rate of interest on the award amount by the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises, Facilitation Council is violation of fundamental principles of reasonableness and fairness. It held that the Petitioner is indirectly deprived of his appeal remedy in view...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - April 2024 [Citations 143 - 180]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags