Punjab & Haryana High Court Weekly Round-Up [February 17- February 23, 2025]

Nominal Index [Citations 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 78 - 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 92]Kanwar Pahul Singh v UOI 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 78Bhola @ Ram Dass v. State of Haryana 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 79DINESH KUMAR & ORS VS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 80Central Bureau of Investigation v. Ravinder Singh @ Ravinder Singh Bhasin and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 81Rajender Singh v. State Of Haryana 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 82ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS. v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 83Balvir Singh @ Dhira v. State of Punjab & others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 84Deepak and others v. State of Haryana and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 85Jasmeen Kaur v. State of Punjab and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 86Ravinder v. State of Haryana 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 87 XXX v. XXX 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 88Atanu Chaudhary v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 89Rahul Rajput v. Food Corporation of India 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 90 VIJAY KUMAR VS STATE OF PUNJAB 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 91Maharishi Markandeshwar Developers Private Ltd v. State of Haryana and others 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 92ReportsDeportation From USA | P&H HC Directs State To Decide On Plea Against Fake Travel Agents, Seeking Establishing Of Emigration Check Posts In PunjabTitle: Kanwar Pahul Singh v UOICitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 78The Punjab & Haryana High Court today directed the State authorities to decide representation within a month on a plea filed seeking action against fake travel agents and for establishing an immigration check post in Punjab to prevent illegal immigration from Punjab to United States of America via "donkey route” (illegal means).If Accused Dies During Pendency Of Appeal & Fine Imposed Is Stayed Or Deposited Before Death, Appeal Will Abate: Punjab & Haryana High CourtTitle: Bhola @ Ram Dass v. State of HaryanaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 79The Punjab & Haryana High Court has made it clear that if an appellant dies during the pendency of the appeal and the fine imposed on him by the trial court has been stayed or if the entire fine amount has been deposited with the Court before death, then the appeal will be abated.Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs UP Govt To Release Funds For Erecting Boundary At Disputed UP-Haryana SiteTitle: DINESH KUMAR & ORS VS STATE OF HARYANA & ORSCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 80The Punjab & Haryana High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh (UP) Government to release funds for erecting boundary pillars at the disputed sites on the UP-Haryana border. Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Vikas Suri said, "Financial grants in the said regard be forthwith released, inasmuch as, within a period of three weeks from today, so that the work of erection of boundary pillars both within the States of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh becomes completed within a further period of four weeks."Cash At Judge's Door Scam Case | Punjab & Haryana HC Allows CBI To Examine 12 Witnesses Against Justice Nirmal YadavTitle: Central Bureau of Investigation v. Ravinder Singh @ Ravinder Singh Bhasin and othersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 81The Punjab & Haryana High Court has allowed CBI to recall or examine 12 witnesses in the infamous cash at judge's door scam case.In 2008, a peon of then sitting judge of Punjab & Haryana Court Justice Nirmaljit Kaur filed a complaint that a bag of Rs.15 lakh cash was delivered at Justice Kaur's Court by a clerk who was later apprehended after the judge asked to catch him. The case was transferred to CBI and according to prosecution, the bag was meant to be delivered to Justice Nirmal Yadav's residence.Record In Warrant Cases | Non-Signing Of Witness's Deposition By Magistrate Will Be Fatal To Case: Punjab & Haryana HCTitle: Rajender Singh v. State Of HaryanaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 82The Punjab & Haryana High Court has said that non- signing of the deposition of the witnesses, by a Magistrate in a warrant case under Section 275 CrPC ( Section 310 BNSS) would be fatal to the case of the prosecution.Justice Harpreet Singh Brar said, "A bare perusal of the (Section 275(4) CrPC) provision indicates that any evidence taken by the jurisdictional Magistrate, in written form, shall be signed by him for it to be considered as evidence and form a part of the record of the jurisdictional Court."UP-Haryana Land Dispute | P&H HC Directs Surveyor General Of India To Study Changing Pattern Of Yamuna & Impact On Both StatesTitle: ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS. v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERSCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 83The Punjab & Haryana High Court directed the Surveyor General of India to examine the changing patterns of Yamuna with the help of revenue agency of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh (UP) in order to study its impact on territories of both the states to resolve land dispute.'Poor Person Forced To Approach Court': P&H HC Slams Authorities For Denying Parole To NDPS Convict During Elections On Assumption Of ReoffendingTitle: Balvir Singh @ Dhira v. State of Punjab & othersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 84The Punjab & Haryana High Court pulled up the authorities for rejecting parole of a man ...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Weekly Round-Up [February 17- February 23, 2025]

Aiman J. Chishti

Tags