Classification Between Allopathic & Ayurvedic Doctors Performing Same Function Unreasonable: Rajasthan HC

A Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court comprising Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjeet Purohit held that classification between Allopathic and Ayurvedic doctors performing the same functions is unreasonable and that Ayurvedic doctors are entitled to the same enhanced retirement age of 62 years along with all consequential benefits. Background Facts The...

Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: September 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 292 To 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 330 NOMINAL INDEX Darogi & Ors. v Chetram & Ors; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 292 M/s Subhash Chand Mukesh Chand v State of Rajasthan & Ors.; 2025 Live Law (Raj) 293 Bank of Baroda v U.N Automobiles Pvt Ltd.; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 294 Kanchan Patil (Mirasi) Samaj v State of Rajasthan; 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 295 Smt. Kamla Khinchi...

Rajasthan High Court Restrains Manufacture, Sale Or Import Of 'Genetically Modified' Foods Till Centre Frames Regulations

Rajasthan High Court has restrained the Food Safety Standards Authority of India and Environment Ministry's Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee from granting permission for sale, manufacture, distribution or import of Genetically Modified (GM) Food till regulations are framed governing such items. The court also directed the FSSAI and the Centre to frame the requisite regulations governing...

Bank Can Assign Debt Even If NPA Classification Is Later Declared Invalid: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a writ petition filed against SBI's assignment of debt in favor of Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. (AARC) holding that even if NPA classification is later declared invalid, it does not affect the validity of assignment of debt. Justice Rekha Borana held that “the assignment cannot be invalidated merely because the NPA classification...

Cheque Issued For Time-Barred Debt Amounts To Promise, S.138 NI Act Can Be Invoked When It Is Dishonoured: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has held that a cheque issued towards a time-barred debt gets dishonoured, the liability under Section 138 NI Act can be invoked in view of Section 25(3) of the Indian Contracts Act, as per which even a time-barred debt forms a valid consideration if there was a written promise signed by the debtor.The bench of Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur held that a cheque...

Rajasthan High Court Quashes State's 'Blanket Ban' On NOCs For Private Pharmacy Colleges, Says Action Devoid Of Legislative Backing

Rajasthan High Court set aside the order passed by the State imposing a ban on granting of NOCs to the private colleges intending to start B.Pharmacy Course as well as for establishment of new colleges seeking to impart the B-Pharmacy Course.Justice Sunil Beniwal held that the act of the State imposing the ban was without any legislative backing or competence, and hence, unlawful. It was...

Excise Dept To Decide Liquor Contractors' Security Refund Claims Within 30 Days, 12% Interest In Case Of Delay: Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan High Court held that the petitions filed by the liquor contractors, challenging non-refund of the security deposit by the Excise Department, even beyond the expiry of their license period, was premature since no order of demand, recovery or forfeiture was yet passed.At the same time, the bench of Justice Sameer Jain opined that administrative inaction leading to an indefinite...

Rajasthan High Court's Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma Inaugurates State Bar Council's Extension Counter At Jaipur

Bar Council of Rajasthan (“BCR”) opened its extension counter in Jaipur which was inaugurated by the High Court's Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Chairman of Bar Council of India (BCI) Manan Kumar Mishra on Friday (October 10) 2025, in the premises of the High Court. The Jaipur bench of the Rajasthan High Court began functioning on January 30, 1977. However, despite the...

S. 319 CrPC | Rajasthan High Court Rejects Plea For Summoning Additional Accused In Assault Case, Says Injured Person Didn't Name Them

Dismissing challenge to an order rejecting plea under Section 319 CrPC for summoning three men in an assault case, Rajasthan High Court held that when the injured person was themselves silent about the involvement and role of these men, then statements of other witnesses hardly made any difference.Section 319, CrPC (Power to proceed against other persons appearing to be guilty of...

Service Of Summons On Soldier Via Whatsapp Not Valid, Rajasthan High Court While Setting Aside Ex-Parte Maintenance Order

Rajasthan High Court held that service of summons to a person who was posted as a soldier, sailor or airman in the Armed Forces, upon WhatsApp number could not be treated as sufficient, in light of the mandate under Order 31 Rule 5 of the General Rules (Civil & Criminal) 2018 (“the Rules”) and Order V Rule 28, CPC.Order 31, Rule 5 of the Rules provides that the process to the...

Rule Of Limitation Not Meant To Destroy Rights Of Parties, Merely Fixes Lifespan On Legal Remedy: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has quashed the order of the Board of Revenue that rejected the application by the petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13, CPC, on the ground that the original application was not accompanied by an application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, but was submitted subsequently.While restoring the order of the Assistant Collector that had allowed...

Civil Court Injunction Protecting Property Cannot Be Challenged U/S 97 Of Panchayati Raj Act: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court held that once a civil court has already passed a decree restraining a party from interfering with peaceful possession of the suit property, the same could not be interfered with by initiating proceedings under Section 97 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (“the Act”).Section 97 of the Act lays down the procedure to file a revision application to the...