Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: March 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 81 To 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 124NOMINAL INDEXMadhu Kanwar v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 81Saloni Institute of Medical Sciences v the State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 82Vikash Kumar v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 83Rajaram v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 84GR v State of the Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 85Manoj Sharma v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 86Lt. Col. Eklavya Tak v Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 87Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited & Ors. v Mukesh Kumar Berwa 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 88Union of India & Ors. v Smt. Rinky Sharma 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 89Chairman and Managing Director, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & Ors. v Ram Niwas Sharma & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 90Vijayraj v State of Rajasthan and other connected applications 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 91M/s Rampabhu Hotels India Private Limited v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 92Satya Narayan v Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 93N.T.P.C. Renewable Energy v The Board of Revenue & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 94Twinkle Singh & Ors. v the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 95State of Rajasthan v Abdul Jabbar 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 96Ramkala Varma v Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 97Managing Committee & Anr. v Dr. Vijay Laxmi & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 98M/s Mewar Associates v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 99Saurendra v Bhugani & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 100Ram Niwas & Anr. v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 101Dr. Saroj Meena v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 102Jagdish Prasad v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 103Smt. Basanti Devi v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 104Ramniwas v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 105Dr. Sabyasachi Swain v Malviya National Institute of Technology & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 106Shri Pankaj Vasita v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 107Rajasthan Sevanivrat Police Kalyan Sansthan v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 108Jitendra Kumar Nirvan v Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 109Bhajan Lal & Anr. v State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 110Shri Manish Kumar Balwani & Ors. v Bank of Baroda & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 111Maa Sai School v Shanti Lal & Ors, and other connected Cross Objection 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 112Shyam Singh v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 113Heer Kanwar v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 114Bhaka Ram v State of Rajasthan & Ors., and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 115Naresh Singh v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 116Lal Chand Jindal v Regional Manager 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 117Sudershan v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 118Santosh Devi v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 119Rajani Products v Bhagwan Das Harwani & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 120Radha v the State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 121Prahlad Sahai Meena v Chief Executive Officer, Admn. Khadi and Village Industries Commission 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 122Sharda Devi Chhajer v. Union of India and others 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 123Vikram Singh Indroi & Ors. v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 124Orders/Judgments of the MonthRajasthan HC Rejects Challenge To Appointment Of Administrator For 49 Municipalities After Expiry Of Tenure Of Existing Elected MembersTitle: Madhu Kanwar v State of RajasthanCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 81The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a plea seeking quashing of a state notification for appointment of Administrator/Authority of 49 municipalities to look after the day-to-day work of these municipalities, following the expiry of tenure of the existing elected members.In doing so the court ruled that Section 320 (Exercise of Municipality's power pending its establishment) of Rajasthan Municipalities Act 2009, empowered the State to appoint an officer, committee or authority until the new municipality was established following the expiry of the term of the current one.Referring to the provision, Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur said, “A bare reading of Section 320 of the Act of 2009 clearly shows that after 'creation' of a Municipality, the State Government is empowered to appoint an officer, committee or authority on its behalf until a Municipality 'established' under the provisions of this Act exercises the powers and discharge the duties and perform the functions of the Municipality. In the present case, since the Municipality established under the law has completed its tenure and till the fresh election takes place and a new Municipality is established in accordance with the provisions of Section 11, the affairs of the Municipality cannot be allowed to be kept in abeyance and, therefore, to perform the day to day affairs and duties of a Municipality, the State Government is competent to appoint an officer, committee or authority to perform the functions of the Municipality till a newly constituted elected ...

Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: March 2025

Nupur Agrawal

Tags