Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: May 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 161 To 2024 194 LiveLaw (Raj) 194NOMINAL INDEXAmit v Shri Ganesh Raj Bansal & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 161Shubham Rewad & Ors. v State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 162Victim v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 163Giriraj Prasad Sharma v State of Rajasthan, and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 164Vinod Shaily & Anr. v State of Rajasthan & Anr, and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 165Ganraj Bishnoi v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 166Hussain Mohammad v Shri Tolaram & Anr., and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 167Smt. Rajani Bhardwaj v Director, Secondary Education 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 168Bhikam Chand v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 169Indra & Anr. v Jagdish Chandra & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 170Shravan Choudhary v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 171Varshita Kanwar v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 172Javed Mohammad and Anr. Versus Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd and Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 173Rakesh Totuka v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 174Khyali Ram v State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 175Rajasthan Urban Infrastructures Development Project Versus M/s National Builders 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 176Khema v State of Rajasthan 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 177Karnawat Marbles v Sohan Singh 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 178Sunil Kumar Bhakoo Versus Smt. Varisha 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 179Balram Yadav v Rajasthan University of Health Sciences & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 180Leela Kumari v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 181Jai Singh v the State of Rajasthan, and other connected petition 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 182Hari Narayan Sharma v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 183Shree Jagdish Bohra Pvt. ITI & Anr. v State of Rajasthan & Ors, and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 184Chirag Naruka v the Chairman, Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan Ajmer & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 185Sakshi Choudhary v Union of India & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 186Dr. Jwala Prasad Kaloshia & Ors. v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 187Vikas Vishnoi v Controller of Examinations, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 188Arta Broch Ceramics Private Limited v Clay Craft (India) Private Limited and other connected petition 2025 Livelaw (Raj) 189Abdul Rahim v the Managing Committee & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 190Mordhawaj v Ramwati & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 191Jasaram Pander v State of Rajasthan and other connected petitions 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 192Smt. Gauri v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 193Rajendra Choudhary & Ors. v State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 194Nadeem Ansari and Ors v. State of RajasthanSupreme Court Collegium Proposes Elevation Of 3 Advocates As Rajasthan High Court JudgesState v Saif AliSuo Moto v State of Rajasthan, and other connected petitionSuo Moto v the State of Rajasthan & Ors.Suo Moto v State of Rajasthan & Ors.Rajasthan High Court Lawyers' Association Writes To CJ Seeking No-Work Period Till May 16 Over 'Volatile' Cross-Border SituationPriyansha Gupta v Union of India & OthersManjeet Deora v State of Rajasthan & OrsOrders/Judgments of the MonthOnce Negative Police Report Is Filed, Prima Facie No Need To Reveal Info In Nomination Form: Rajasthan HC Rejects Election Plea Against MLATitle: Amit v Shri Ganesh Raj Bansal & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 161The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition challenging the election of Hanumangarh MLA Ganeshraj Bansal alleging non-disclosure of certain criminal cases, observing that once the police had filed a negative final report prima facie the successful candidate was not required to reveal those cases in the nomination form.Justice Dinesh Mehta in his order said:"This Court has it own reservation about the legality and sustainability of the issue which the petitioner has canvassed and in prima-facie opinion of this Court, once the police has filed negative Final Report, the candidate furnishing nomination paper is not required to give particulars of those cases. The petitioner has neither brought to the Court's notice any statutory provision nor any precedent which enjoins upon a candidate to furnish information even in those cases wherein the police has given him a clean chit".Rajasthan HC Refuses To Quash FIR Against State University Students Booked For Assaulting Ex-Professor Based On Compromise Between ThemTitle: Shubham Rewad & Ors. v State of Rajasthan & Anr.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 162The Rajasthan High Court rejected a plea for quashing an FIR based on compromise between certain students of Rajasthan University accused of assaulting a former professor, observing that the alleged offences were serious in nature and per se breaches the tranquility and peace of society.Justice Sameer Jain in his order said:"The allegations noted in the FIR pertain to a group of students/persons who have locked the gate of the Administrative Block of...

Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: May 2025

Nupur Agrawal

Tags