IBC News
90-Day Timeline Under Regulation 2B Of IBBI Regulations For Schemes Of Compromise/Arrangement Is Directory, Not Mandatory: NCLAT, Chennai
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai bench comprising Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Judicial Member) and Jatindranath Swain (Technical Member) have held that the 90-day timeline prescribed under Regulation 2B(1) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 for completing a scheme of compromise or arrangement under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013...
DM Can Re-Execute Possession Orders U/S 14 Of SARFAESI Act After Illegal Re-Entry By Borrower: MP High Court
A division bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court, comprising Justice Anand Pathak and Justice Hirdesh, has allowed an appeal and upheld that a district magistrate can re-execute possession orders u/s 14 of the SARFAESI Act after illegal re-entry by the borrower. The Court directed the respondent authorities to provide necessary assistance to the petitioner to dispossess the borrower...
Corporate Debtor May Be Permitted To Complete Project Under IRP's Supervision If A Structured Plan Is Proposed: NCLT Indore
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Indore Bench of Sh. Shammi Khan (Judicial Member) and Sh. Sanjeev Sharma (Technical Member) has held that while admitting a petition under Section 7 of the IBC filed by homebuyers based on the default committed by the corporate debtor, the corporate debtor can be directed to complete the project under the reverse Corporate...
Interest Claims Under MSMED Act Can't Be Added To Principal Amount: NCLT Mumbai
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench of Justice V. G. Bisht (Retd.) (Judicial Member) and Sh. Prabhat Kumar (Technical Member) has held that since the NCLT under the IBC is not competent to adjudicate interest claims under the MSMED Act, such interest claims cannot be added to the principal amount to meet the threshold limit for filing an insolvency petition. The...
Property Alloted In Lieu Of Consultancy Fees Constitutes Financial Debt: NCLT Mumbai
The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Court-V, comprising Sh. Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey (Member- Judicial) and Sh. Charanjeet Singh Gulati (Member- Technical), has held that a property allotted in lieu of consultancy fees can be considered as a financial debt. The application was filed requesting to issue a direction to the Resolution Professional to admit the claim filed...
Debt Arising From Structured Supply Chain Finance Facility Does Not Constitute 'Financial Debt' U/S 5(8) Of IBC: NCLT New Delhi
The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench, Court-IV, comprising Shri Manni Sankariah Shanmuga Sundaram (Member-Judicial) and Shri Atul Chaturvedi (Member-Technical), has held that the debt arising out of a structured supply chain finance facility doesn't come under the ambit of financial debt u/s 5(8) of the IBC, 2016. The application was filed by Prudent Arc Limited to...
Petition U/S 9 Of IBC Is Inadmissible Without Payment Received By Corporate Debtor In Subcontracted Work Done By Operational Creditor: NCLT Hyderabad
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Hyderabad bench of Sri Rajeev Bhardwaj (Hon'ble Judicial Member) and Sri Sanjay Puri (Hon'ble Member Technical) has held that in absence of any payment received by the Corporate Debtor in a subcontracted work executed by the Operational Creditor, application under section 9 of the IBC cannot be entertained. Filing such an application would be...
Adjudicating Authority Can Pass Order U/S 114 Of IBC Based On Resolution Professional's Report If No Repayment Plan Is Submitted: NCLT New Delhi
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) New Delhi bench of Sh. Ashok Kumar Bhardwaj (Hon'ble Member (Judicial) and Sh. Man Mohan Gupta (Hon'ble Member Technical) has held that a meeting of the Committee of Creditors is not required to be summoned under Regulation 17A of the Personal Guarantors Regulations when no repayment is submitted by the Personal Guarantor. The Adjudicating...
DRT Cannot Reject Consolidated Plea By Tenants Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) cannot reject a consolidated plea by tenants under the SARFAESI Act.The petition was filed, challenging an order passed by the registrar of the DRT 1, Ernakulam. By that order, it declined to register the application preferred by the petitioners against the notice of dispossession served by the Advocate Commissioner....
Writ Petition Is Maintainable Despite Remedy Under IBC, If NCLT Order Is Passed In Violation Of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court
The present writ petition was filed seeking the quashing of an order passed by the NCLT, Kochi Bench. By that impugned order, the adjudicating authority has directed the resolution professional to reject the claim filed by the home buyers, including the petitioner. The corporate debtor, who is the builder and the landowner, entered into an agreement to construct the building named...
Scheme Of Compromise Sanctioned By Court Under Companies Act Cannot Be Frustrated By Invoking Provisions Of SARFAESI Act: Calcutta HC
The Calcutta High Court has ruled that a scheme of arrangement/compromise sanctioned under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, cannot be unilaterally frustrated by a secured creditor by invoking the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The application was filed, praying for the execution of an order sanctioning a scheme of arrangement/ compromise under section 391(2) of...
IBC | Naming Creditor In Balance Sheet Not Mandatory, Acknowledgment Extends Limitation: Supreme Court Allows IL&FS Plea
Reaffirming that an entry in a company's balance sheet amounts to a valid acknowledgment of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 irrespective of the name of the creditor, the Supreme Court today (July 30) revived the dismissed insolvency plea filed by IL&FS against Adhunik Meghalaya Steels for a default of ₹55.45 crore, citing an acknowledgment of debt in the corporate...