News Updates
NCLAT Stays Insolvency Proceedings Against RHC Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Principal Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Mr. Naresh Salecha stays the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of RHC Holdings Pvt Ltd. initiated by NCLT Principal Bench, New Delhi on 13.05.2022. RHC Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (RHC) is the company through which Singh Brothers namely Malvinder Singh and Shivinder Singh sold...
Arbitration Cases Weekly Round-Up: 29th May To 4th June, 2022
Allahabad High Court Section 47 CPC Application Is Not Maintainable In Execution Proceedings UnderArbitration Act, 1940: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Bharat Pumps and Compressors versus Chopra Fabricators Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 269 The Allahabad High Court has held that an application under Section 47 of the CPC is not maintainable in the execution proceedings...
Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: May 30 To June 5, 2022
NOMINAL INDEXCitations 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 513 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 542Case Title: SH JAGMOHAN KASHYAP v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 513 Case Title: JIVA INSTITUTE OF VEDIC SCIENCE & CULTURE AND ANR v. PUNEET CHHATWAL & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 514 Case Title: HEAD DIGITAL WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED v. TICTOK SKILL GAMES PVT LTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 515 Case...
Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: May 2022 [Citations 388 To 512]
CITATIONS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 388 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 512NOMINAL INDEXCase Title: V K VERMA v. CBICitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 388Case Title: OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PVT. LTD. v. PARVEEN JUNEJA & ORS.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 389Case Title: DR. SANJIV GUPTA & ANR. v. SH. S.S. VERMACitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 390Case Title: KV SAGAR v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT & ANR.Citation: 2022...
A Mere Deviation From Normal Professional Practice Is Not Necessarily Evidence Of Negligence; Reiterates NCDRC
A bench comprising Justice Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member and Binoy Kumar, Member, has relied upon the case of Jacob Mathew vs. State of Punjab and Anr., which stated that "A mere deviation from normal professional practice is not necessarily evidence of negligence. Also, a mere accident is not evidence of negligence. So also, an error of judgment on the part of a professional...
Taking Away The Right Of Candidate To Be Considered In General Category If He Is Not Found Entitled To Reservation Sought By Him Violative Of Article14,16:P&H HC
The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that in matters pertaining to the appointment to any office under the State, the general category seats are to be filled from the merit list first and thereafter, the reserved category seats are to be allocated as per the assigned quota. Thus, regardless of whether a candidate is found or not found entitled to reservation sought by him, he still has...
Kerala High Court Weekly Round Up : May 30 To June 4, 2022
Nominal Index [Citations: 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 248 - 258]SNDP Yogam & Anr v. G. Krishnamoorthy & Ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 248Dr. Vikas R.S v. State of Kerala & Ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 249Vijay Babu v. State of Kerala & Anr, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 250Adhila v Commissioner of Police & Ors, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 251Vijith Vijayan v. Union of India, 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 252Aboobacker...
Supply Of Works Contract Services To Nagar Nigam Attracts 12% GST: AAR
The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) consisting of Arun Richard and Atul Mehta has ruled that 12% GST is payable on the supply of work contract services to Nagar Nigam. The applicant, M/s Amnex Infotechnologies Private Limited, submitted that Request for Proposal (RFP), issued by the Shahjahanpur Nagar Nigam, Uttar Pradesh, for the selection of a Master System Integrator...
Sale Of Car By Company After Using It For Business Purpose Attracts 18% GST: AAR
The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) consisting of Arun Richard and Atul Mehta has ruled that 18% GST is payable on the sale of a car by a company after using it for business purposes.The applicant, M/s. Dishman Carbogen Amcis Limited, purchased a new car for Rs. 80 lakhs on 16-02-2018 for use in its business. The applicant did not avail GST Input Tax Credit at the time of purchase...
Quashing Of FIR In Matrimonial Disputes Is Welcome: Delhi High Court Quashes Rape FIR Against Father In Law
The Delhi High Court has observed that in matrimonial offences, quashing of FIR is welcome as it shows that parties have decided to put an end to the lis as well as to the misery they undergo due to a matrimonial case pending between them. "The fact that now-a-days Sections 376 and 354 of IPC are being used along with Section 498-A IPC, which later on are compromised and are brought to this...
In Medical Negligence Case, NCDRC Finds Hospital And Doctors Liable
A bench comprising Justice R.K. Agrawal, President and Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member, has observed that the patient's duty of care starts from the time of admission. The responsibility of care is on treating doctor and hospital till the patient's discharge from the hospital. The bench stated that it appears the doctors in the S.P. Fort hospital in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala was...
Pujaris & Unauthorised Occupants Of Dharamshalas Cannot Claim Vested Right To Remain In Kalkaji Temple Premises: Delhi High Court
Observing that the occupants of the dharamshalas and pujaris cannot claim a vested right to remain in city's Kalkaji Temple premises, the Delhi High Court has directed that such dharamshalas shall be vacated on or before 6th June, 2022. Justice Pratibha M Singh, who was dealing with a bunch of pleas concerning redevelopment of the temple premises, added that in case of failure to comply with...




![Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: May 2022 [Citations 388 To 512] Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: May 2022 [Citations 388 To 512]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2022/02/01/500x300_408682-delhi-high-court-monthly-digest.jpg)







