BREAKING | Anis Khan Death: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Transfer Probe To CBI, State Constituted SIT Ordered To File Chargesheet

The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday refused to transfer to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) the investigation into the death of student activist Anis Khan. Anish Khan was found dead at his home in Amta block in Howrah district in the early hours of Saturday, February 19, 2022 under mysterious circumstances.The Court had earlier taken suo moto cognisance of the case after terming the incident as 'grave and shocking'. It had turned down a prayer for a CBI probe and had allowed the State government-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) to continue with its probe but under the supervision of a Howrah district judge. The Court had also ordered for a second post mortem to be conducted by the SIT under the supervision of the Howrah district judge.Justice Rajasekhar Mantha refused to transfer the investigation to the CBI by opining that the SIT in its investigation report has itself implicated some police officials and thus the apprehension that the accused police officers wold be shielded by SIT is unfounded. "In the instant case, the SIT itself has implicated some police officials in its investigation report, finding fault with the manner and conduct of raid. The petitioner's apprehension that the accused police officers would be shielded by the police, is therefore devoid of merit. In the facts of the case, merely because some police officers are involved there is no need for apprehending of impropriety in the investigation or the trial as the SIT is comprised of very highly ranked police personnel. Any other omission or mistake in future can be addressed under the provisions of the Cr.PC", the Court ruled. The Court further underscored that the concerned Sessions Judge shall deal with the trial independently, completely uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. It was also opined that the Court's observations are only for the purpose of addressing the prayers made by the petitioner for transfer of the probe to the CBI and not for any other purpose.Directing the SIT to file the charge-sheet immediately and conduct further investigation if required, the Court ordered, "The investigation conducted by the SIT is in order, as of now. Charge- sheet shall be filed immediately. The SIT always has powers to conduct further investigation, inter alia, upon discovery of new evidence and file supplementary charge sheets, if necessary. The Trial Court has powers under Sections 311 and 319 of the Cr. P.C., which are wide enough to include any other matter in course of trial and find any other person than those to be named in the charge sheet to be filed."Justice Mantha further averred that it is expected that the charge-sheet is put up for committal and the trial is commenced and concluded expeditiously, but not later than six months from the date of committal.The Court also noted that the father of the deceased had not made any statements under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC alleging any conspiracy behind the death or murder of his son. Reliance was also placed on the evidence eon record which showed that there was absolutely no scuffle whatsoever, indicating any injury other than the mechanical injury due to impact of the body on a blunt hard surface. Thus, it was held that there is no fault with the SIT for not having considered the conspiracy angle in its probe. Recording the submission of the Advocate General that the conclusion of the SIT that the deceased died after falling from the 2nd floor of his residence is the most plausible conclusion, the Court opined, "Therefore, according to the Ld. Advocate General, the conclusion of the SIT that the deceased Anis Khan died after falling from the 2nd floor, is the most plausible conclusion. This Court does not wish to detail any other of the arguments and counter-arguments made by the petitioner and the State, since it would prejudice the prosecution and/or the defense in course of the trial."The Court also observed that there is no relationship between the deceased's participation in protests against the State government and his death and accordingly underscored, "The reference to protests against land grabbing of Aliah University are equally vague. There is a long time-gap between the incidents in question and the death of the victim. The causal connection between the said incidents and the death of the victim appears to be rather remote."Senior counsel Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya appearing for the deceased's father had earlier objected to the report submitted by the SIT of the West Bengal police on the ground that it does not disclose how and on whose permission the raid took place at the home of Anis Khan at Amta in Howrah district. The senior counsel had further objected to the findings of the SIT by submitting that it was 'ridiculous' to suggest that the death of Anis Khan was non-homicidal as has been stated in the report.On the other hand, Advocate General S.N Mookherjee appearing for the State government had apprised the Court that the...

BREAKING | Anis Khan Death: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Transfer Probe To CBI, State Constituted SIT Ordered To File Chargesheet

Aaratrika Bhaumik

Tags