BSNL VRS-2019 Retirees Can Be Considered For Engagement As Consultants In CPSEs Or Govt Depts, Won’t Amount To Re-Employment: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has ruled that BSNL employees, who opted for Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) 2019, can be engaged in any Central Public Sector Enterprise (CPSE) or Government Department on contractual or consultancy basis. The division bench of Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta was dealing with a writ petition filed by former employees of BSNL, who had taken VRS from the government telecom company in 2019. Their petition challenged the "clarification/directive" dated 25.06.2021, issued by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), which interpreted the term “employment/re-employment” in the VRS Scheme to include engagement on contractual/consultancy basis. The DoT had said that since the employees, who took VRS in 2019, did not retire in due course on attaining the age of superannuation, they could not be considered for engagement on contractual or consultancy basis. The petitioners argued that the BSNL VRS Scheme, 2019, did not contemplate to create a separate class between VRS retirees and the superannuated employees. Observing that the BSNL VRS-2019 Scheme only barred re-employment of a VRS retiree in a CPSE, the division bench said that “engagement on contractual/consultancy basis” does not fall within that restriction. “The expression “re-employed” normally has been assigned to mean, taken back into service or taken into service. It should not be equated with a “contract of service””, the court said, while holding that the purpose of BSNL VRS-2019 was not to debar the persons who had opted for the VRS Scheme, from being engaged as contractual consultants. The court held that the engagement of BSNL VRS-2019 retirees in any CPSE or government department on contractual or consultancy basis is not in violation of Clause 8 (iii) of BSNL VRS-2019. “It is accordingly held that clarification/directive dated 25.06.2021 interpreting the definition of employment/re-employment to include engagement on contractual/consultant basis is contrary to the terms and conditions of BSNL VRS-2019. The applicants as such are eligible to be considered for appointment on consultancy/contractual basis," the bench ruled. The Court observed that engagement on contractual or consultancy basis is not a regular employment and it is generally notified to meet out the exigencies till the regular recruitment is made. Some of petitioners were engaged as Consultants at the Licensed Service Area (LSA), Haryana, however, their contract was subsequently terminated, citing the Office Memorandum dated 25.06.2021 issued by DoT. The DoT in the OM held that engagement in a CPSE on contractual/consultancy basis would also qualify as “re-employment or employment” under the DPE guidelines dated 20.07.2018, which prohibits the VRS optees of a CPSE from taking up employment in another CPSE. The DoT also said there is no distinction between “employment” and “re-employment” in the DPE Guidelines. The petitioners challenged the clarification issued by the DoT before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in 2021. They also challenged the notification, issued by the DoT seeking engagement of Consultants on short term basis, which expressly barred the BSNL VRS retirees from being considered for the same. The CAT dismissed their plea in December 2021. The DoT argued that there is no distinction between 'employment' and 're-employment' in DPE Guidelines dated 20.07.2018 and engagement in a CPSE/government on contractual/consultancy basis would also qualify as reemployment/employment under the DPE guidelines. "The DPE guidelines prohibit VRS retirees from employment in another CPSE including consultancy/contractual engagement. The petitioners were already paid upto 125% of the last drawn salary in terms of the VRS Scheme. Further, even in case of engagement on contractual/consultancy basis in a CPSE or government, the employee gets salary from the CPSE/government and hence, the engagement attracts the bar under VRS BSNL-2019 scheme as well as DPE guidelines," it said. The petitioners argued that the decision violats their fundamental rights under Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. They averred that deeming engagement as “Consultants on short term contract basis” as “re-employment”, is detrimental to the public interest and is a deviation from the government policy. The division bench said a bare perusal of Clause 8 (iii) of BSNL VRS-2019 reflects that the only restraint which is envisaged under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme-2019 is that the employees retired under this Scheme, would not be eligible for re-employment in any other CPSE. In the eventuality, the employee still desires to take up re-employment in any CPSE, such employee was required to refund the entire amount of exgratia received under the Scheme to BSNL, the court noted “It is pertinent to notice that there is no specific clause restraining the engagement ...

BSNL VRS-2019 Retirees Can Be Considered For Engagement As Consultants In CPSEs Or Govt Depts, Won’t Amount To Re-Employment: Delhi High Court

Parina Katyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Parina Katyal

BSNL VRS-2019 Retirees Can Be Considered For Engagement As Consultants In CPSEs Or Govt Depts, Won’t Amount To Re-Employment: Delhi High Court

Parina Katyal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Parina Katyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers