Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: December 19 To December 25, 2022

Citations [2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1192 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1215]NOMINAL INDEXINDIAN PILOTS GUILD & ANR v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1192Umesh v. State (and other connected matters) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1193VIJAY AGRAWAL THROUGH PAROKAR v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1194PRAVEEN GARG v. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1195AADESH KUMAR AND ORS. v. SH. AMIT SINGLA AND ANR. and other connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1196Gorang Gupta v. GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1197RANAJIT ROY v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1198SUCHITA SHRIVASTAVA v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1199GULAM MAHABUB v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1200MAN MOHAN PATNAIK v. CISCO SYSTEMS CAPITAL INDIA PVT.LTD & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1201D.S. CHEWING PRODUCT LLP & ORS. v. FOOD SAFETY OFFICER 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1202AB MAURI INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. VICKY AGGARWAL & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1203HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION (INDIA) & ANR v. SADAR LABORATORIES PVT LTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1204Harsh Vibhore Singhal v. The Cabinet Secretary Government of India & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1205ReNew Hans Urja Pvt. Ltd. vs. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1206Rajinder Kumar Versus State 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1207M/s. Vallabh Textiles Versus Senior Intelligence Officer 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1208DLF Ltd. versus IL&FS Engineering and Construction Company 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1209Welspun One Logistics Parks Fund I versus Mohit Verma & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1210STATE v. DENIS JAUREGUL MENDIZABAL 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1211National Highways Authority of India v. Lucknow Sitapur Expressway Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1212ZYDUS WELLNESS PRODUCTS LTD. v. DABUR INDIA LIMITED 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1213YOGESH PARIHAR v. DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1214PCIT Versus Pawa Infrastructure (P) Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1215Testing Of Aviation Personnel For Psychoactive Substances Essential, No Impediment In Implementing Civil Aviation Requirements: Delhi High CourtTitle: INDIAN PILOTS GUILD & ANR v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION & ANRCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1192The Delhi High Court has observed that testing of aviation personnel, including pilots, cabin crews and Air Traffic Controllers (ATCs), for psychoactive substances is essential, considering the nature of services being rendered by them.Justice Prathiba M Singh gave nod to the implementation of Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR) issued by the Ministry of Civil Aviation on January 31 for detecting any behavioural, cognitive and physiological changes due to use of such substances by aviation personnel."After perusing CAR as also after hearing parties and their counsels, it is clear that the testing of personnel for psychoactive substances is essential, considering the nature of services being rendered," the court said.Limitation Period Won't Come In Way Of Moving Applications For Compensation To Victims Of Sexual Offences: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Umesh v. State (and other connected matters)Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1193Directing Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) to move applications on behalf of the victims of sexual offences for compensation in the cases registered between 2012 to 2017, the Delhi High Court has clarified that there will be no requirement to file a separate application for condonation of delay to seek compensation in such cases.Observing that since no limitation for filing an application for compensation is provided under Section 357(A) of the Cr.PC or Section 33 of the POCSO Act, such a provision under the Part-II of the Delhi Victims' Compensation Scheme (DVCS)-2018 cannot be used or invoked in a hyper- technical manner to defeat the rights of the victim for whose assistance and support the entire Scheme has been formulated.Interim Bail On Medical Grounds Shouldn't Be An Option Only When Prisoner Is On Deathbed: Delhi High CourtTitle: VIJAY AGRAWAL THROUGH PAROKAR v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENTCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1194Observing that a prisoner suffering from serious health ailments should be given an opportunity to undergo adequate medical treatment, the Delhi High Court has said that the discretion of granting interim bail on medical grounds may not be exercised only at a stage when the person is breathing last or is in the position that he may not survive.Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma said howsoever serious the offence may be, the health condition of a human being is paramount. The court said the health concern of a person has to be taken care of by the State and keenly watched by the judiciary.High Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Constitutional Validity Of Rule 9(2) Of Delhi Higher Judicial Service RulesTitle: PRAVEEN GARG v. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND ORS.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1195The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea challenging the constitutional validity of the recently-amended Rule...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: December 19 To December 25, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags