Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: October 17 To October 23, 2022

Citations 2022 [LiveLaw (Del) 980 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1005]NOMINAL INDEXIC-76585M MAJOR NISHANT KAUSHIK vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 980Manika Batra v. Table Tennis Federation of India & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 981Umar Khalid v. State 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 982M/S CELL PAGE COMMUNICAITON v. VIJAY SHANKAR PANDEY 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 983ABC v. State 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 984PCIT Versus M/s Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 985Balaji Enterprises Versus Principal Additional Director General 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 986Samata Party v. ECI & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 987x v. GNCTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 988Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. versus Narender Singh 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 989Vag Educational Services v. Aakash Educational Services Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 990Diamond Entertainment Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. versus Religare Finvest Limited 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 991MEHENDIRAM FOODS PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 992MOHD KASHIF v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 993Shiva Fire Works and Anr v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 994ATUL VADERA v. THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 995X v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (ACTING THROUGH ITS SECRETARY) & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 996DR JITARANI UDGATA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 997JOHNEY REBERIO v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 998Manzar Imam v. NIA & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 999Jitendra Narain v. State & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1000ALPHAVECTOR INDIA PVT. LTD. vs M/S SACH INDUSTRIES & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1001Omega Finvest LLP versus Direct News Private Limited 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1002Calcom Cement India Ltd. versus Binod Kumar Bawri & Ors. And Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited versus Binod Kumar Bawri & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1003AERO CLUB versus BHAWNA TRADING CO. & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 1004DR. PRAGYA SHUKLA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR and other connected matter 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 10051. Armed Forces Tribunal Exercising Similar Jurisdiction As High Court, No Appeal 'Can/Should' Lie Before HCs: Delhi High CourtTitle: IC-76585M MAJOR NISHANT KAUSHIK vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORSCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 980Months after a division bench of Delhi High Court said the jurisdiction of High Courts under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution cannot be bypassed merely by making a provision for direct appeal to the Supreme Court, a co-ordinate bench has said that ordinarily, no appeal from a final decision or order of the Armed Forces Tribunal can lie before the High Court.The division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Saurabh Banerjee said there is no provision under The Armed Forces Tribunal Act for an appeal against any such final decision or order of the AFT before any other forum like the High Courts."Further, as per Section 31 of the Act, such an appeal to the Apex Court shall lie within 30 days from the date of the said decision of the Tribunal with the leave of the Tribunal or the Apex Court, as the case may be," said the bench.2. Delhi High Court Appoints Former SC Judge Justice Vineet Saran As Returning Officer For TTFI ElectionsCase Title: Manika Batra v. Table Tennis Federation of India & Ors.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 981The Delhi High Court has appointed the retired Supreme Court Judge, Justice Vineet Saran, as the returning officer for conducting elections of the Executive Committee (EC) of Table Tennis Federation of India (TTFI).Justice Rekha Palli requested the former judge to prepare the electoral college and conduct the elections as per the federation's constitution. The retired judge has also asked to ensure that only those state associations which are compliant with the Sports Code are permitted to participate in the elections.The returning officer, will be paid a sum of Rs. 7,50,000 besides secretarial expenses, which will be borne by the TTFI, Justice Palli said in an order on October 17.3. Umar Khalid's Name Finds A Recurring Mention In Conspiracy Behind Delhi Riots, Protests Were Geared Towards Grave Consequences: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Umar Khalid v. StateCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 982Denying bail to activist Umar Khalid in Delhi riots larger conspiracy case, the Delhi High Court observed that the protests against Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA) and 2020 North-East Delhi riots were prima-facie orchestrated at various "conspiratorial meetings" held from December 2019 till February 2020, some of which were also attended by Khalid.A division bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Rajnish Bhatnagar said that Khalid's name finds a recurring mention from beginning of the conspiracy till the riots, adding that he was a member of WhatsApp groups like DPSG and Muslim students of JNU and had also participated in various conspiratorial meetings.Related StoriesIn Umar Khalid Bail Order, Delhi High Court Invokes Maximilien Robespierre, Pandit Nehru To Explain 'Revolution'[Delhi Riots] Attack on Police Personnel by 'Women Protestors In ...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: October 17 To October 23, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: October 17 To October 23, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers