[Honey Trap Scandal] 'No Need To Transfer Case To CBI', MP HC Directs SIT To Take Appropriate Steps In Accordance With Law [Read Order]

While hearing petitions demanding that the infamous 'Honey Trap Scandal' of Madhya Pradesh be investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on Saturday (05th September) said that the court was satisfied with the investigation being done by the 'Special Investigation Team' (SIT) and there was no need to transfer the case to the CBI.A Division Bench of Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Shailendra Shukla said,"This Court has carefully gone through the entire cases referred by learned counsel for the parties heard learned counsel for the parties at length and no material was brought before this Court on the basis of which it could have been held that the investigation has not been done properly by the State of Madhya Pradesh. In light of the aforesaid, this Court does not find any reason to transfer the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation."The Background of the caseThe petitioner, a social worker, had filed this present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of Public Interest Litigation in respect of a crime, which took place in the State of Madhya Pradesh allegedly relating to some sex scandal (infamously known as 'Honey Trap Scandal').The petitioner's contention was that on 17.09.2019, one Harbhajan Singh, Superintending Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Indore filed a complaint before the police authorities alleging that he was being blackmailed and a 'Honey Trap' gang is working in the State of Madhya Pradesh which is involved in blackmailing high profiles politicians, bureaucrats, businessman etc.It was further stated that based upon the complaint of Mr. Harbhajan Singh dated 17.09.2019, Madhya Pradesh Anti-Terrorist Squad and Crime Branch of the State unearthed the 'Honey Trap' Racket and on 19.09.2019, two women were arrested.Later on, total of six arrests were made by the police and the police had seized large number of electronic gadgets including spy-cameras, laptops, mobile phones etc.The police had also allegedly recovered videos and audiotapes relating to conversation with leaders, bureaucrats, businessman etc.The petitioner's contention was that offence in respect of crime in question not only relates to blackmailing but it relates to money laundering and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act as well as other crimes also.It was further stated that the influential people are involved in the matter, and therefore, the case should be transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation.Arguments put forth by the respondents/stateThe respondents/state submitted before the court that after registering the criminal case in this Scandal, investigation was carried out, which was monitored by this Court and a charge-sheet has been filed against seven accused persons, who have been arrested so far and the case is still being investigated under the provision of Section 173 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.The respondents also stated that during the course of investigation heavy cash amount was recovered from the possession of accused persons namely Arti Dayal and Shweta Vijay Jain and the information was forwarded to the Income Tax Department as well as to the Enforcement Directorate.The respondents submitted that the electronic gadgets, seized in the matter, have been forwarded to Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad for forensic analysis and a report is awaited from CFSL, Hyderabad.The respondents also filed their replies to the Interlocutory Applications preferred in the matter by the intervenor and their contention was that they have carried out an investigation in a most impartial manner and they shall be taking further steps in the matter after the CFSL report is received.The respondents further stated that the entire investigation was monitored by this Court from time to time and question of handing over the case to Central Bureau of Investigation does not arise.It was also stated that after conducting an investigation, keeping in view the directions issued by this Court from time to time, charge-sheet has been filed and a progress report in a sealed cover furnishing all minute details has been submitted to this Court.In nutshell, it was argued that the entire investigation was carried out during the pendency of the present writ petitions and charge-sheets have been filed in two and it has been stated that after receiving the report in respect of electronic gadgets and the material which has been sent to CFSL, Hyderabad, as investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is still in progress, the respondents shall be taking appropriate steps in accordance with law keeping in view the statutory provisions as contained under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.The question before the courtThus, the issue before the Court was whether in light of the progress report, which had been submitted to this Court, the investigation of the case...

[Honey Trap Scandal] 'No Need To Transfer Case To CBI', MP HC Directs SIT To Take Appropriate Steps In Accordance With Law [Read Order]

Sparsh Upadhyay

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Sparsh Upadhyay

[Honey Trap Scandal] 'No Need To Transfer Case To CBI', MP HC Directs SIT To Take Appropriate Steps In Accordance With Law [Read Order]

Sparsh Upadhyay

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Sparsh Upadhyay

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers