The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking presence of an Advocate during search and seizure under Section 67 of the GST Act, of the Petitioner's sweet betel nut manufacturing unit. The bench of Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Justice Vandana Kasrekar held that the Petitioner had "failed to point out any statutory provision or any such legal right"...
We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok