Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: June 2022

NOMINAL INDEX Pramod Kumar Sethi S And Ors V Bank Of Baroda And Ors 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 154 Indore Wakf Mazaar Hazrat Nahar Shah Wali Sahab Wake Mauja Khajrana, District Indore v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 155 Seema Jatav v The State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 156 Shobit Tripathi v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 157 Manohar Silawat v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 158 In Reference . (Madhya Pradesh) v. Ankit Vijayvargiya 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 159 Prism Johnson Limited v. UOI 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 160 Dileep v. M.P. State Election Commission 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 161 Sanjay Trading Company Versus State Of Madhya Pradesh 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 162 M/s Saisanket Enterprise Versus Authority of Advance Ruling 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 163 M/S Ujas Associates versus M/S KJS Cement (India) Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 164 National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Guddi Bai And Anrs 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 165 K.C.Rajwani V The State Of Madhya Pradesh Law & Legislative Affairs And Anr 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 166 ORDERS/JUDGMENTS OF THE WEEK MP High Court Upholds Eligibility Criteria Laid Down By Bank Of Baroda For Its Borrowers To Avail Benefits Of Resolution Framework 2.0 Issued By RBI Case Title : Pramod Kumar Sethi S And Ors V Bank Of Baroda And Ors Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 154 The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench upheld the eligibility criteria laid down by the Bank of Baroda for its borrowers to avail the benefits of the Resolution Framework 2.0 issued by the Reserve Bank of India. The Banking Ombudsman had come up with the said policy to provide relaxation to individual borrowers and small business owners reeling from financial hardships in the wake of COVID-19. Officials Holding Additional Charge Of Waqf Board Posts Can Order Supersession Of Management Committee, Appoint Executive Officer: MP High Court Case Title: Indore Wakf Mazaar Hazrat Nahar Shah Wali Sahab Wake Mauja Khajrana, District Indore Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 155 The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench, held that a Deputy Collector and Additional Collector, holding additional charge of Chief Executive Officer and Administrator, respectively, of the Madhya Pradesh Waqf Board can exercise powers under Section 67 (Supervision and supersession of committee of Management) and 38 (Powers of Board to appoint Executive Officer) of the Waqf Act. 'Discretion Vested In Project Officer Usurped By Superiority Authority': MP High Orders Reinstatement Of Anganwadi Worker, Cites Jurisdictional Error Case Title : Seema Jatav v The State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 156 The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench directed reinstatement of an Anganwadi Worker holding that the authorities did not follow the principles of natural justice while deciding her case. The Court further held that the plea of alternate remedy would not come to rescue of the State as the Project Officer took action against the Petitioner at the insistence of his superior authorities, without using his own discretion and therefore, the case also suffered from jurisdictional error. 'Appears To Be A Big Scam': MP High Court Denies Bail To Janpad Panchayat CEO For Allegedly Embezzling Crores Of Rupees Under Vivah Sahayata Yojna Case Title: Shobit Tripathi Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 157 The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench recently denied bail to the CEO of a Janpad Panchayat who allegedly embezzled money set out for the beneficiaries of the Vivah Sahayata Yojna. The Court observed that it was prima facie a white colour crime case and that it appeared to be a big scam where crores of Rupees were siphoned off- Further investigation is still going on regarding role of other culprits. Incidentally, other two accused namely Yogendra Sharma and Hemant Sahu were neither Govt. employees nor were contractual employees in any manner but were working at the instance of applicant prima facie, therefore, possibility cannot be ruled out that some more members must be involved in commission of offence. It appears to be a big scam where crores of rupees were siphoned off on the pretext of giving benefit of विवाह सहायता योजना to poor construction workers. "Frivolous Case": Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Rape Case Filed By 'Second Wife' After A Delay Of 18 Years Case title - Manohar Silawat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (MP) 158 The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently quashed a rape case against a man registered at the instance of his 'second wife' as the Court noted that it was a frivolous case and her version indicated false allegations against the man. The Bench of Justice Anand Pathak observed that it was vexatious and frivolous litigation just to exert pressure...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: June 2022

Sparsh Upadhyay

Tags