News Updates

'Petitioners Are Like Any Other Couple You Might Meet, Except They Are Both Women': Plea Moved In Delhi HC Seeking Marriage Equality For Same-Sex Couples

Karan Tripathi
8 Oct 2020 8:48 AM GMT
Petitioners Are Like Any Other Couple You Might Meet, Except They Are Both Women: Plea Moved In Delhi HC Seeking Marriage Equality For Same-Sex Couples
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

A plea has been filed in the Delhi High Court seeking marriage equality for same-sex couples in India.

Filed by Dr Kavita Arora, who has been living with her partner Ankita Khanna for 8 years, the petition seeks a direction to be issued to the Marriage Officer, South East Delhi, to solemnize their marriage under the Special Marriage Act.

It is the case of the Petitioner that the fundamental right to choose one's own partner for marriage under Article 21 of the Constitution extends to same-sex couples as well.

Any contrary reading, it is argued, would violate the equality before law and would go against the spirit of the Supreme Court's judgement in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India.

The petition states that:

'The law bestows a myriad legal rights and protections in matters of succession, taxation, insurance, maintenance, pension, health and marital privileges that are unavailable to unmarried couples. The Petitioners are deprived of all the legal rights and social benefits that flow from the institution of marriage as the SMAexcludes same-sex couples.'

It is submitted by the Petitioners that what they seek is not the right to be left alone, but the right to be acknowledged as equals and to be embraced with dignity by the law.

It is further argued that the Navtej Johar judgment has held that sexual orientation places a positive and negative obligation on the State, which includes non-discrimination under Article 15 of the Constitution.

'The right to choose a marital partner is a positive obligation of the State to be fulfilled through its existing marriage laws. Excluding same-sex marriage from a legislation governing civil marriage outside personal law renders the SMA violative of constitutional guarantees of dignity, liberty, and equality', the petition claims.

Today, the matter came up for hearing before the Single Bench of Justice Navin Chawla who has directed for this petition to be listed before a Division Bench on October 14.

The Petitioner in this case was represented by Senior Advocate Menaka Guruswami, Ms Arundhati Katju, Mr Govind Manoharan, and Ms Surabhi Dhar.

Next Story
Share it