S.125 CrPC | Not Obligatory For Claimant To Implead 'All Eligible Persons' Having Sufficient Means In Proceedings For Maintenance: Uttarakhand HC

The Uttarakhand High Court has clarified that it is not mandatory for a person claiming maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. to implead all the persons responsible for maintaining him/her, having sufficient means, as respondents. It is up to the claimant from whom he/she needs maintenance and is free to implead any one or all the persons. While dismissing a revision petition against such non-impleadment, a Single Judge Bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari held, "Section 125(1) of Cr.P.C. opens with the expression "if any person". This reflects the legislative intent that any one of the several persons may be chosen for claiming maintenance and it is not obligatory on the part of the claimant seeking maintenance to name all the persons having sufficient means to be proceeded against. In other words, it is for the claimant to decide whether he/she wants maintenance from any one or all the persons, who are liable to maintain him/her." Factual Background The claimant (respondent no. 2 herein) has four children. However, she moved an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C., claiming maintenance at the rate of ₹5,000/- per month from her husband and ₹20,000/- per month from her elder son (the revisionist herein). In the said application, revisionist prayed for impleading his other siblings as respondents on the ground that they are well placed in life and therefore, they are also equally responsible for providing maintenance to their mother. However, the prayer made by the revisionist was rejected by the Judge, Family Court. Being aggrieved by such order, this revision petition was filed before the High Court. Court's Observations The Court, at the outset, held that the Judge, Family Court has given valid reasons for rejecting impleadment application by observing that it is for the person claiming maintenance to decide from whom he/she wants maintenance. Further, it held that the Court cannot compel the claimant to implead her other children as respondents to the maintenance application. The Court stressed on the terms "if any person" as mentioned in Section 125(1) of Cr.P.C. Thus, it was of the view that the legislative intent was that any one of the several persons may be chosen for claiming maintenance and it is not obligatory on the part of the claimant seeking maintenance to name all the persons having sufficient as respondents. Therefore, the claimant is free to decide whether he/she wants maintenance from any one or all the persons, who are liable to maintain him/her. Accordingly, the Court upheld the impugned order made by the Court below and the revision petition was dismissed. While concluding, the Court remarked, "Even otherwise also, impleadment is a concept of civil law, which is engrafted in Code of Civil Procedure and there is no provision in Cr.P.C., which enables a respondent to a proceeding to seek impleadment of some other person in the said proceeding." Case Title: Manish Saini v. State of Uttarakhand Case No.: CRLR No. 736 of 2022 Order Dated: 6th December 2022 Coram: Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Counsel for the Revisionist: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent: Ms. Lata NegiCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Utt) 45 Click Here To Read/Download Order

S.125 CrPC | Not Obligatory For Claimant To Implead 'All Eligible Persons' Having Sufficient Means In Proceedings For Maintenance: Uttarakhand HC

Jyoti Prakash Dutta

Tags