Would Read Privacy Verdict Before Hearing Jairam Ramesh Plea: CJI

The Chief Justice Dipak Misra led bench today said it will first go through the crucial judgement on privacy before taking a call on Congress leader Jairam Ramesh's challenge to the Lok Sabha Speaker's decision to certify a bill to amend the Aadhaar law as a money bill.A nine judge constitution bench had declared privacy a fundamental right.The plea was mentioned before a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices P C Pant and D Y Chandrachud for an early hearing, but the apex court said it would first peruse the judgement delivered by its nine-judge constitution bench declaring the right to privacy a fundamental right.“You mention it on Friday (September 1). We will also read the judgement, CJI Misra”. said.On February 13, the last date of hearing, then Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi told the court that the Speaker’s decision on any legislative procedure can never be questioned by Court.“Tentatively we do not agree with the petitioner but we shall hold a detailed hearing after four weeks. Be ready on that day”,a bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar said after Rohatgi showed the constitutional provision relating to the issue.A Money Bill is one that contains provisions for taxes, appropriation of funds etc. Money Bills can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha, and the Rajya Sabha cannot make amendments to such bills passed by the Lok Sabha. The Rajya Sabha can suggest amendments, but it is the Lok Sabha’s choice to accept or reject them.Senior lawyer P Chidambaram arguing the matter for Ramesh has questioned the “grossly unconstitutional” passing of the Aadhar law as money bill. Ramesh while proposing amendments in the bill in the Rajya Sabha, had then expressed “anguish” that the bill was brought as a money bill, an act he likened to “knocking a nail in the coffin of the Upper House”.Accusing the BJP-led NDA government of showing “utter contempt” of the Rajya Sabha for taking the money bill route to pass the Aadhaar bill, the opposition party had earlier indicated that the matter could be challenged in the court.Rejecting the Rajya Sabha’s five amendments and the Opposition’s appeal not to make “haste”, the Lok Sabha had on March 16, 2016 adopted the Aadhaar (targeted delivery of financial and other subsidies, benefits and services) Bill, 2016, by a voice vote after rejecting the recommendations for five amendments made by the Upper House earlier in the evening.Armed with the Speaker’s decision that it was a money bill, the government pushed it in the Rajya Sabha, which cannot amend it but only make recommendations for amendment to the Lok Sabha.Once the Lok Sabha passes a money bill with or without amendments recommended by the Rajya Sabha, it is deemed to have been passed by both the Houses.Showing urgency in getting the law through, the government, which enjoys a comfortable majority in the Lok Sabha, had brought the measure to the lower house within an hour of being returned by the Rajya Sabha.

Would Read Privacy Verdict Before Hearing Jairam Ramesh Plea: CJI

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Would Read Privacy Verdict Before Hearing Jairam Ramesh Plea: CJI

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers