Allahabad High Court Monthly Digest: June 2025

NOMINAL INDEX M/S Metro Amusement Pvt. Ltd. Abu Plaza, Abulane v. Union Of India And Another 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 204 M/s Patanjali Ayurved limited v. Union of India and Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 205 Anwar Dhebar vs. State Of Up And 2 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 206 Angad Soni v. Arpita Yadav 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 207 Sachin Sirohi And Another vs. State of U.P. 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 208 Shailendra Kumar Rai v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 209 Savita Devi @ Pinki Gautam @ Shivangi Shishodiya v. Jitendra Gautam 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 210 Saurabh Mishra v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical Health And Family Welfare U.P. Lko. And 3 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 211 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 212 Syed Mohammad Seraj Ali vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. (Home) Deptt. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 2 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 213 Devendra Singh v. State Of Up And 4 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 214 Shiv Narayan Gupta vs. Garib Chandra 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 215 Sudhir @ Sudhir Kumar Chaurasia vs. State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Ministry Of Home And 3 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 216 Deenbandhu Samgra Swasthya Avam Siksha Shodh Sansthan Thru. Chairman Shafiullah Vs. Union Of India Thru.Its Secretary,Ministry Of Education Central Secretariat, New Delhi And 3 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 217 Prem Pal Singh vs. Prem Pal Singh Dhangar And 12 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 218 Sushila Yadav vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko. And 2 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 219 Shakeel Ahmad vs. State of U.P. 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 220 Bhagwandeen vs. State of U.P 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 222 State Of Up And 3 Others v. Mahaveer Singh And 5 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 223 Ansar Ahmad Siddique vs. State of U.P. 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 224 ORDERS/JUDGMENTS OF THE MONTH [Employees Provident Fund Act] No Appeal Lies Against Rejection Of Review Plea, Writ Petition Is Maintainable: Allahabad High Court Case Title: M/S Metro Amusement Pvt. Ltd. Abu Plaza, Abulane v. Union Of India And Another [WRIT - C No. - 9281 of 2025] Case Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 204 Relying on its earlier decision in Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II and Another, the Allahabad High Court has reiterated that a writ petition would be maintainable against the order in review under Section 7-B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 as no statutory appeal is provided against such order. Allahabad High Court Rejects Patanjali's Plea Against ₹273.5 Crore GST Penalty Case Title: M/s Patanjali Ayurved limited v. Union of India and Others Case Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 205 The Allahabad High Court has directed continuation of proceedings under Section 122 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 against M/s Patanjali Ayurved limited's 3 plants even though proceedings under Section 74 of the Act have been dropped against them. The bench of Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit held “Under the present GST regime, persons who are not liable to pay tax under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act may very well be liable for penalties as described in the twenty-one sub-sections of Section 122(1) and under sub-sections 122(2) and 122(3).” Chhattisgarh Liquor Scam | 'Grounds Of Arrest Not Supplied In Writing': Allahabad HC Declares Arrest Of Two Accused In UP FIR 'Illegal' Case title - Anwar Dhebar vs. State Of Up And 2 Others 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 206 and a connected matter Case Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 206 The Allahabad High Court declared the arrests of Anwar Dhebar, a businessman and brother of the former Raipur Mayor, and former IAS officer Anil Tuteja, both accused in a money laundering case linked to the alleged ₹2,000 crore Chhattisgarh liquor scam, as illegal. A bench of Justice Siddhartha Varma and Justice Madan Pal Singh granted them bail in the FIR lodged agains them in Meerut (UP), noting that the arrest memos did not contain any column for the ground of the arrest of the petitioners and they were neither informed about the grounds of arrest, nor reasons for arrest. Marriage Can Be Dissolved By Mutual Consent If One Spouse Files Criminal Case Against The Other Within 1 Year: Allahabad High Court Case Title: Angad Soni v. Arpita Yadav [First Appeal Defective No.115 of 2025] Case Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (AB) 207 The Allahabad High Court has held that if after filing of criminal case by one spouse against other, the parties have approached the court for divorce by the mutual consent, the same must be granted by invoking the proviso to Section 14 (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act provides for divorce by mutual consent. Section 14 of the Act mandates that no divorce petition can be presented before any court within 1 year of marriage....

Allahabad High Court Monthly Digest: June 2025

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags