Allahabad High Court Monthly Digest: March 2023

NOMINAL INDEX Maneesh Pathak vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 80 Vinod Bihari Lal vs. State of U.P. and Another and connected matter 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 81 Ali @ Ali Ahmad @ Mohd Ali Ahmad vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 82 Mohd. Abdul Khaliq Vs. State Of U.P. And Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 83 The Indian Express Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India And 15 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 84 Kalika Pratap Singh vs. State Of U.P. And Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 85 Krishna Kumar Pal @ Umesh Pal vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 86 Rajesh Chandra @ Rakesh And Another vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 87 U.P. Sr.Basic Shiksha Mahasha.U.P.Officer Shri N.P.M.Vidy.Raebareli Thru. President Ankur Chaudhari vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/Prin. Secy. Basic Education U.P. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 88 Syed Mohiuddin Ahmad vs. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 89 X (Minor) v. State of U.P. and Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 90 Ramu Mallah vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 91 Purushottam Chaudhary vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation Thru. The Superintendent Of Police Cbi/Acb Lko 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 92 Kamlesh Pathak vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 93 Mohd. Mustaqeem vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Nia along with a connected matter 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 94 Subesh Kumar Singh vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Civil Secrett. Lucknow And Others along with connected matters 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 95 Satya Pal v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 96 Atikur Rehman vs. State of UP 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 97 Sujeet Sharma vs. State of U.P 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 98 In Re Disruption Of Power Supply In Prayagraj vs. State Of U.P. Through Additional Chief Secretary Power U.P. Government And Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 99 Saroj Kumari vs. State Of U.P. And 5 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 100 Randeep Singh Surjewala vs. State of U.P. and Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 101 Nand Gopal Gupta @ Nandi vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 102 Isha Agrawal vs. State of U.P. and Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 103 Om Prakash vs. State of U.P. and Another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 104 Khalid Azeem @ Ashraf vs. State Of U.P. And 5 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 105 Vishwanath vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home, Lko 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 106 Shrey Singh vs. Union Of India And 9 Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 107 Mahendra Pal And Ors. vs. State Of U.P.Thru Addl.Chief Secy. Deptt Of Basic Edu.Andors along with connected matters 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 108 Deepak vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And Others 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 109 Agra Development Authority v. Baba Construction Pvt. Ltd. FAO No. 1033 of 2021 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 110 Arvind Singh vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 112 Mohammad Tariq Qashmi vs. State of U.P. 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 113 ORDERS/JUDGMENTS OF THE MONTH Impermissible To Dismiss Bail Plea Due To Absence Of Counsel, Court May Appoint Amicus For Accused & Hear Matter: Allahabad HC Case title - Maneesh Pathak vs. State of U.P. [CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18536 of 2020] Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 80 In a significant observation, the Allahabad High Court has said that it is impermissible to dismiss bail applications for non-prosecution on account of the absence of counsel as it is violative of the fundamental rights of the prisoners guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Court added that in such cases, an amicus curiae should be appointed to represent the applicant/prisoner and the matter be heard on merits. Religious Conversion| 'Their Intent Behind Charitable Works Is Dubious': Allahabad HC Denies Anticipatory Bail To 'SHUATS' VC, Director Case title - Vinod Bihari Lal vs. State of U.P. and Another and connected matter Case citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 81 The Allahabad High Court on Tuesday denied anticipatory bail to the Vice Chancellor of Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (formerly Allahabad Agricultural Institute) (Dr.) Rajendra Bihari Lal and Institute's Director Vinod Bihari Lal in connection with a mass religious conversion case. Noting that they are an influential person and their intent behind the charitable works appears to be dubious, affecting the interest of a marginal section of society, the bench of Justice Manju Rani Chauhan said that they can't claim parity with other persons who have been released on anticipatory bail. The bench noted that material evidence regarding mass conversion has been collected by the investigating agency that affects society at large and hence, it is a case concerning a serious offence and cannot be taken lightly. 'Mafia Don In Making, His Role Figured In Umesh Pal Murder Case': Allahabad HC Denies Bail To...

Allahabad High Court Monthly Digest: March 2023

Sparsh Upadhyay

Tags